We performed a comparison between AWS CodeBuild and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."
"The integration is a good feature."
"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."
"The integration is a good feature."
"The solution provides good integrations."
"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."
"It provides repeatable CI/CD throughout our company with lots of feedback on failures and successes to the intended audiences via email and Slack."
"TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool."
"One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications."
"Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."
"The integration is a valuable feature."
"TeamCity is very useful due to the fact that it has a strong plug-in system."
"The deployment fails sometimes."
"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."
"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."
"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."
"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."
"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."
"I need some more graphical design."
"The upgrade process could be smoother. Upgrading major versions can often cause some pain."
"Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone) to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly."
"I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."
"If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users."
"It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there."
AWS CodeBuild is ranked 9th in Build Automation with 4 reviews while TeamCity is ranked 6th in Build Automation with 25 reviews. AWS CodeBuild is rated 8.8, while TeamCity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS CodeBuild writes "Provides good integrations, is flexible, and has a comparable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans". AWS CodeBuild is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab, GitHub Actions, CircleCI and Tekton, whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and Harness. See our AWS CodeBuild vs. TeamCity report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.