We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I appreciate AWS Glue for its cost-effectiveness."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Glue is scalability."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Glue is its ease of use and good documentation. Additionally, we can do all the transformations that we need."
"AWS Glue is a stable and easy-to-use solution."
"AWS Glue is fast and managed by AWS. Hence, you don't have to worry about capacity and the performance of Glue jobs. It has integrations with other data stores of AWS. The product offers metadata management, logging, and ETL processing capabilities. It comes with a powerful feature, Glue Studio, which helps to do queries interactively within the community. It is a managed service and very secure. Another popular and mature service is S3."
"The most valuable feature for me is the visual interface of AWS Glue."
"What I like best about AWS Glue is its real-time data backup feature. Last week, there was a production push, and what used to take almost ten days to send out around fifty-six thousand emails now takes only two hours."
"Transformations are valuable because you can modify or override complex data logic from an open source or Spark to solve issues."
"GoldenGate enables us to merge and transform data from various sources in real time. It's a powerful tool that can read and load most data sources."
"You can use Oracle GoldenGate as a DR for your system."
"This solution provides us with real-time replication and it does not affect the performance of other operations, which is very important to us."
"It's very simple to configure, it's very simple to implement. In addition, the ability it has to capture data and transmit it with incredible speed is better than any of the product out there. It's extremely powerful."
"You can put data together from a few databases into one database or the other way, from one database into several. It transforms data in real-time."
"It moves the data as you set it up, and it works. I am also very impressed with its stability and scalability. It is not super feature-rich, but the new releases have more functionality. It recently had more native integrations with Oracle Database. If you are using it against an Oracle database, it has a lot more functionality."
"For small databases, GoldenGate handles the migration well."
"It is a scalable solution."
"AWS Glue would be improved by making it easier to switch from single to multi-cloud."
"Glue could perform better. It sometimes takes too long to test a Glue job. Google Cloud Platform offers more Python scripts than AWS."
"Only people who can code, either in Java or Python, can use the product freely. Those who don't know Java or Python might find using AWS Glue difficult."
"In terms of performance, if they can further optimize the execution time for serverless jobs, it would be a welcome improvement."
"Overall, I consider the technical support to be fine, although the response time could be faster in certain cases."
"It fails to handle massive databases acquired from various sources."
"There should be more connectors for different databases."
"I would like to see a more robust interface on the no-code side. This would be nice to be able to split cells."
"GoldenGate is expensive. It's costly because this solution is unique in our market. The GoldenGate Cloud Service is cheaper than the on-premise solution."
"Oracle GoldenGate could improve the price."
"The solution is quite costly, and if they could reduce their pricing, it would be more economical to implement."
"The tool's connections are disconnected at times. The tool needs to integrate other databases."
"Some issues regarding stability need to be resolved."
"We struggle with memory. It's limited. However, it may be because of our unique business case and how we use it that it's limiting for us."
"The product is not easy to use."
"A clean and user-friendly graphical interface based on common design principles would be beneficial."
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 48 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, SSIS and Talend Open Studio, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and SAP Data Services. See our AWS Glue vs. Oracle GoldenGate report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.