We performed a comparison between AWS PrivateLink and Check Point Remote Access VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Our users find the interface very comfortable to use."
"We use it to connect our sites. We have a couple of sites that need to interconnect."
"The solution is easy for administrators because you can check logs and write rules on the same page."
"It keeps us safe when browsing the internet and when sharing confidential information with our colleagues."
"The VPN hides your IP address and encrypts your online traffic and it essentially ensures that your fingerprints cannot be traced on the Internet."
"Scalability is great. We have been able to grow as a corporation due in part to this type of solution."
"It is a scalable solution...The technical support team of the solution is very good."
"To maintain the authorization of the connected user, Check Point provides multi-factor authentication for an RA VPN client to make sure legitimate users have access to resources."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Security is an area of concern in the product where the solution needs to improve."
"Sometimes it causes the consumption of machine resources, and also improves the scanning since they consume many resources in the clients' machines."
"Without a doubt and with the new trends in technology, Check Point should already have a blade with a 2MFA solution and not through some other vendor."
"Sometimes the application slows down the computing device, and this affects workflows."
"The Compliance software blade is available only for the Windows operating systems family, so no macOS security checks are implemented and performed."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN's enterprise support could be improved."
"The main feature that would be improved within Check Point Remote Access is its operation within Linux OS, as it currently does not have many features for that OS."
"They need to increase their timeout. Right now, it will fail after ten seconds, however, it shouldn't fail until after 20. If you don't get on your phone right away and check on your authentications, it will kick you out."
"Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS PrivateLink is ranked 15th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 62 reviews. AWS PrivateLink is rated 7.0, while Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of AWS PrivateLink writes "A highly stable tool that needs to improve its security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". AWS PrivateLink is most compared with AWS Direct Connect, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Perimeter 81 and Lumen MPLS IP VPN, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Check Point Harmony Mobile and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.