We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"The web solution effectively protects from vulnerabilities and cyber attacks."
"Their technical support has been quite good."
"The customized billing is the most valuable feature."
"AWS WAF helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection that happen within the retail industry."
"Its best feature is that it is on the cloud and does not require local hardware resources."
"The most valuable aspect is that it protects our code. It's a bit difficult to overwrite code in our application. It also protects against threats."
"What I like best about AWS WAF is that it's a simple tool, so I could understand the basics of AWS WAF in two to three hours."
"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."
"We don't have much control over blocking, because the WAF is managed by AWS."
"We should be able to do proper whitelisting."
"I believe there is a need to move towards real-time analysis with the help of AI and intelligent systems in the future. This would reduce the reliance on manual work and enhance the functionality of detection protection. By incorporating AI-driven data analysis and data science techniques, we can improve the solution's user-friendliness, security compatibility, and accuracy."
"They should work to define more threats, add more security, and make it more compliant with more security companies."
"They should make the implementation process faster."
"One area that could be improved is the DDoS protection."
"The solution can improve its price."
"The solution is cloud-based, and therefore the billing model that comes with it could be more intuitive, in my opinion. It's very easy to not fully understand how you tag things for billing and then you can quite easily run up a high bill without realizing it. The solution needs to be more intuitive around the tagging system, which enables the billing. Right now, I have a cloud architect that does that on our behalf and it isn't something that a business user could use because it still requires quite a lot of technical knowledge to do effectively."
"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and Radware DefensePro.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.