We performed a comparison between Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration and IBM B2B Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The automation of all the data transfers is great."
"Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration has a great user interface that is easy to understand."
"The technical support on offer through the portal is very helpful and responsive."
"B2B provides a secure communication channel."
"B2B Integrator is multi-platform, so it can be integrated with Windows, Unix, or whatever, and it can work with almost all programming languages. It can also transfer a lot of data in a short time. For instance, a system I recently implemented exchanges about 20 million files a day."
"The solution offers good integration capabilities."
"Out-of-box process orchestration yields quick implementations."
"Everything from the order to fulfillment to the payment process, except for physical packing and shipping, is fully automated for some customer orders."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility and the range of EDI standards that IBM Sterling can handle."
"This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications."
"The initial setup can be a bit tricky."
"The solution's performance could be improved and made similar to that of IBM Sterling B2B Integrator."
"IBM B2B Integrator could improve the business process itself, there is no resignation of duties and in terms of the console should be changed in a way that is more user-friendly."
"There is no related transaction stored in the database because it's an OLTP application."
"API-Fication required, and there should be more clarity on their cloud migration strategy."
"The initial setup is complex."
"API integration could be improved. The legacy system could be on the cloud."
"There should be a single place to do things, rather than making it complicated, not moving away and truncating the old features but instead coming up with the new and still keeping the old stuff confuses people sometimes."
"Map translator needs more enhancements."
"The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough."
More Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is ranked 12th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 2 reviews while IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 42 reviews. Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is rated 7.6, while IBM B2B Integrator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration writes "Simplifies processes, has helpful support, and offers useful automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "A widely-used, on-premises solution with tons of peer support". Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is most compared with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, whereas IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, SAP Process Orchestration and SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI). See our Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. IBM B2B Integrator report.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.