We compared Check Point Antivirus and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection based on users' reviews in six categories. We reviewed all of the data, and you can find the conclusion below.
Features: Check Point Antivirus impressed users with its diverse set of valuable features like sandboxing, real-time detection, and integration with analytics solutions and the cloud. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection offers seamless integration with Windows, a central alert console, and real-time monitoring of suspicious URLs.
Room for Improvement: Check Point Antivirus requires quicker customer assistance, better performance of the graphical user interface, enhanced defense against zero-day attacks, and more budget-friendly pricing options. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection could offer more training and enhance its security features. Users also requested better encryption, gray email management, and integration with non-Microsoft platforms.
Ease of Deployment: Some users found Check Point’s setup process to be uncomplicated and fast, while others noted that it required several engineers and took around a week to finish. Users had varied experiences setting up Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, ranging from easy to difficult. It may necessitate dedicated personnel for maintenance.
Service and Support: User reviews have provided no information about the customer service of Check Point Antivirus so far. While some users found Microsoft support to be helpful and responsive, others experienced slower response times.
Pricing: The price of Check Point Antivirus may vary depending on partnerships and negotiations. Some users consider Check Point's pricing to be expensive but say it is cost-effective. However, it may not be affordable for small or medium-sized companies unless they have sufficient capital. Some users said Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is expensive, but others considered it reasonable.
ROI: Check Point Antivirus provides added features like a sandbox and VPN licenses, enhancing its value. Users have experienced improved protection and promising growth with Check Point Antivirus, delivering a better ROI than other security options. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection has proven to be a profitable investment.
Comparison Results: Check Point Antivirus offers advanced features like sandboxing, real-time detection, and scalability. At the same time, some users say Check Point could be more affordable and improve its GUI performance. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is praised for its seamless integration with Windows and useful features like URL holding and threat management, but users say it could improve in areas such as pricing, documentation, and security features.
"Check Point detects files containing malware, which some users are trying to download or access. Additionally, it can consolidate multiple emails into one."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"They have pretty much everything you can ask for as far as features are concerned. That is because they know their market. They are focused on what they do and they do only that."
"They have a better endpoint catchment rate due to their reliability."
"The application runs very fast and does not affect the performance speed of the device where it is installed."
"The initial setup is easy."
"With Check Point, we can implement security measures to control access to the network and systems, which helps prevent unauthorized access."
"It offers a really simple and minimally invasive installation for users."
"We can migrate seamlessly without any disruptions to our operations."
"It provides security to both on-premises and Azure infrastructures."
"It is easy to configure, easy to use, easy to add exclusions, easy to track, and easy to add anything else if you want."
"We like the holding facility that is available for potentially suspicious URL's. This allows a real-time review to be performed before the email reaches a users inbox."
"It's definitely scalable."
"Microsoft EOP's most valuable feature is a shared mailbox."
"The initial setup is just a standard process."
"The scalability is pretty good; it does what it is supposed to do."
"We would like to see better guides in the future with more concrete examples of the best practices."
"The product should improve its pricing."
"We'd like the solution to kindly start this service offering on SaaS and PaaS models also."
"Reporting and management could be improved."
"Check Point services and antivirus solutions can improve their customer offerings by offering various discounts in their subscription model and they can also reconsider their pricing model as well."
"One of the most frequent problems that Check Point Antivirus presents is that some antivirus updates fail continuously."
"There needs to be more internally connected systems in order to achieve real-time effectiveness."
"Overall I didn't personally face any issues while implementing Check Point Antivirus."
"Microsoft 365 Defender and EOP policies are stable with the proper license. However, with the basic policy, it's hard to say it's stable due to configuration limitations."
"I think the implementation could be more streamlined."
"The tool's classification for bulk email is cumbersome."
"The reporting needs a little bit of improvement."
"The tool is not 100% stable."
"Having orchestration features added to Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, particularly automation and remediation, would be quite useful."
"Microsoft has some training portals, but more could be developed."
"The price of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection could be reduced to make it more competitive."
More Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Antivirus is ranked 6th in Anti-Malware Tools with 50 reviews while Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is ranked 11th in Anti-Malware Tools with 34 reviews. Check Point Antivirus is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point Antivirus writes "Compatible, cost-effective, and highly customizable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) writes "An effective email security solution that provides DLP, Safe Attachment, and Safe Links". Check Point Antivirus is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, CrowdStrike Falcon and VirusTotal, whereas Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection, Cisco Secure Email, Fortinet FortiMail and Mimecast Email Security. See our Check Point Antivirus vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) report.
See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.