We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management and Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is notable for its extensive data protection, incident identification, and adaptable rule sets. It provides control over IAM roles, training options, and robust reporting. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration excels at API-driven integration and advanced prevention of data leaks. Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management could enhance its reporting, vulnerability assessments, integration, and customizability. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration requires improvements in integration, performance, and collaboration capabilities.
Service and Support: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management has been praised for its helpful support. Some Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration customers were dissatisfied with response times and requested support in more languages, but others said the support was excellent.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is quick and painless, and the overall deployment varies. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration has an automated setup that requires minimal user intervention.
Pricing: Some users found Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management to be reasonably priced and compatible, while others perceive it as costly. Reviewers had mostly good things to say about the cost of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration. Users describe the licensing as uncomplicated and budget-friendly.
ROI: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management offers benefits in terms of compliance management and decreased administrative workload. One user reported a 35% return on investment (ROI) and a notable growth rate. Reviewers also said that Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration consistently delivers a solid return. Users reported estimated ROIs ranging from 15% to 80%.
Comparison Results: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is preferred over Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration. Users appreciate CloudGuard's comprehensive data security and protection for the entire cloud infrastructure. It offers strong incident detection, granular reporting, and the ability to customize rulesets based on compliance requirements. CloudGuard provides IAM role control and embedded machine learning for real-time attack prevention. Users find the dashboard intuitive, reporting powerful, and the product's ability to enhance security and resolve incidents impressive.
"We like PingSafe's vulnerability assessment and management features, and its vulnerability databases."
"Cloud Native Security is user-friendly. Everything in the Cloud Native Security tool is straightforward, including detections, integration, reporting, etc. They are constantly improving their UI by adding plugins and other features."
"The offensive security feature is valuable because it publicly detects the offensive and vulnerable things present in our domain or applications. It checks any applications with public access. Some of the applications give public access to certain files or are present over a particular domain. It detects and lets us know with evidence. That is quite good. It is protecting our infrastructure quite well."
"It is fairly simple. Anybody can use it."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its storyline, which helps trace an event back to its source, like an email or someone clicking on a link."
"We mostly use alerts. That has been pretty good. If we use the alert system from Amazon, it is much costlier to us, so we use PingSafe."
"The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best features."
"Support has been very helpful and provides regular feedback and help whenever needed. They've been very useful."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is the training."
"Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP's initial configuration is very easy. It is plug-and-play. It also gives regular updates."
"Dome9 continues to be a major piece of our cloud security architecture and has given our senior leadership team a high degree of confidence in our ability to protect our cloud environment."
"This solution helps to keep everything visible, and it also alerts us if something is wrong, such as if someone opened extra ports or services that they are not supposed to. This is a valuable tool for monitoring and maintaining our cloud environment."
"This product provides a really nice visualization of the infrastructure, including network topology, firewalls, etc."
"It has an analytics service that does research for us."
"The various CNAPP modules have granted more visibility of our cloud applications to our system engineers and developers."
"It provides critical insights that enable the IT team to plan and launch smart investigations when there are security breaches."
"The ease of management and intuitive administration are excellent."
"In my opinion, it's one of the best products. It does protect other things like Slack and Salesforce, which are more about communication."
"For Threat Prevention, I was impressed with this feature and the solution's effectiveness. It has been very good."
"The first most remarkable thing is the integration with the Office 365 solution, which is easy, fast, and totally transparent for the user."
"Being able to mass quarantine and remove emails from end users' mailboxes has become extremely important to us as we have grown in size."
"The API is its most valuable feature. On the API side, relative to the rest of the market, Check Point is decades ahead of its competitors."
"We have managed to have an impressive reduction in phishing that used to enter our system before applying Check Point."
"As with most of the other Check Point products, the CloudGuard SaaS has the advanced visibility of the events and alerts."
"For vulnerabilities, they are showing CVE ID. The naming convention should be better so that it indicates the container where a vulnerability is present. Currently, they are only showing CVE ID, but the same CVE ID might be present in multiple containers. We would like to have the container name so that we can easily fix the issue."
"I'd like to see better onboarding documentation."
"With Cloud Native Security, we can't selectively enable or disable alerts based on our specific use case."
"The integration with Oracle has room for improvement."
"We use PingSafe and also SentinelOne. If PingSafe integrated some of the endpoint security features of SentinelOne, it would be the perfect one-stop solution for everything. We wouldn't need to switch between the products. At my organization, I am responsible for endpoint security and vulnerability management. Integrating both functions into one application would be ideal because I could see all the alerts, heat maps, and reports in one console."
"The Kubernetes scanning on the Oracle Cloud needs to be improved. It's on the roadmap. AWS has this capability, but it's unavailable for Oracle Cloud."
"A beneficial improvement for PingSafe would be integration with Jira, allowing for a more streamlined ticketing system."
"I would like PingSafe to add real-time detection of vulnerabilities and cloud misconfigurations."
"The entire system is complicated, and the setup process may not cater to the company's demands."
"Scalability, particularly in workload protection, is an area that needs improvement."
"CloudGuard could be more customizable. It has built-in standards for things like GDPR compliance. But depending on your business lane, you might want to build your own controls based on your own standards."
"Compliance checks on cloud resources against various industry standards and compliance framework templates need to be improved."
"Automation and advanced threat prevention have room for improvement."
"The Check Point solution is somewhat expensive."
"There are opportunities for improvement that can be addressed through a roadmap."
"The integration process could be enhanced by enabling integration at the organizational level rather than requiring the manual setup of individual accounts."
"The integration with Gsuite could be improved, especially when reporting the amount of emails it manages to filter."
"Stability has been a pain point. I was going back and forth with my product engineer and project manager for a couple of months. I had the product in a demonstration mode and wasn't satisfied with the results initially. After a few alterations and a few revisions later, it is fine."
"Other vendor support teams go after fixing the issue the moment that they join the remote session. The problem that I have faced with Check Point support is that they share the case number with me, then it takes at least two days for them to join a remote session with us, even though we have asked for this timeframe to change. Even though we have already explained the problems that we are facing or the business pain points in our network on the call or email, we have to repeat the problem statements again in the console. It can take four or five days to resolve the issue from the moment they understand the problem. This includes the time to teach their R&D or internal team whatever the issue is. I have faced timeframes as long as seven to 10 days for fixing some issues."
"Support can be a bit quicker in helping the customer."
"It would be nice to see them expand their collaboration capabilities to include other suites and integrate with lesser-known products."
"They should consider a module that allows the customizing of reports so we can generate executive information for the client (to explain in simple language the general security situation in the SaaS environment)."
"The solution fails to support hybrid deployments."
"There could be more automation features included for it."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 64 reviews while Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is ranked 9th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 49 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration writes "Has a user-friendly dashboard, a great anti-phishing algorithm, and sandboxing for testing". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Mimecast Email Security and Cisco Secure Email. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
