We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and Ivanti Connect Secure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"It is easy to install the Endpoint Remote Access VPN client on different platforms."
"It offers a simple configuration and setup."
"We have more control over the activity that users have on the internal network, thanks to the monitoring offered by Check Point and the security provided by the gateway."
"The solution implemented in the cloud allows us to easily scale in cases of user increase."
"Setting policies allow, block, and limit users' access."
"Our number of users working remotely vastly increased during the COVID 19 pandemic. Check Point Remote Access VPN allowed us to quickly make the transition from in-office to remote work."
"The safety of online interactions when working with this product has enabled members to convene productive meetings without fear of being attacked."
"The solution is easy for administrators because you can check logs and write rules on the same page."
"The most valuable features of the solution are reliability and uptime."
"It's quite stable."
"The most valuable feature is being able to securely connect and use virtual desktops."
"Ivanti secures access to the corporate network from various devices and locations."
"It is customer-friendly. It is quite easy for our users to connect. There is also the flexibility of the features."
"The tool's most valuable feature is remote access."
"This is a very secure and stable tool."
"The most valuable feature of Pulse Connect Secure is its ease of use."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The Compliance software blade is available only for the Windows operating systems family, so no macOS security checks are implemented and performed."
"There needs to be a way to create a VPN client specific to our environment so that we can easily lock down who can connect."
"The client-side UI is fundamental, and there is nothing to see."
"You have no ability to reserve a total number of licenses. The VPN user licenses are assigned per gateway, and if you enable MEP function is not so easy to size the gateway licenses."
"In the case of URL translation of the VPN Web portal, the requests made from the front end to the back end weren't valid (due to the use of dynamic subdomains). In the case of host translations, the request was made to the same host, however, we cannot specify the ports, which, in our case, are used to redirect to different servers."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN could be more user-friendly."
"There is always room for innovation and the addition of new features."
"It would be good to have Remote Access VPN solutions for Check Point edge services."
"The most valuable features of Pulse Connect Secure are the user-friendly connection and interconnecting."
"Ivanti Connect Secure needs to have faster connections. It also needs to improve the stability."
"The product's price is an area where improvements are required."
"Connection-wise, Pulse Connect Secure could be faster, and this is its area for improvement."
"We need to know how many live active users there are and we can't. We even updated the server, however, we still can't see the proper level of live connections. Right now, it's showing as 300 users and my customer does not have that many users in his organization."
"The solution must be more user-friendly."
"We want to switch to another solution because there are some challenges with the support from Pulse. The quality of documentation is also not good. It is sometimes very hard to find documentation that provides a solution and describes how all this works."
"The stability could be better. There are sometimes bugs in the system."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 62 reviews while Ivanti Connect Secure is ranked 7th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 26 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while Ivanti Connect Secure is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Connect Secure writes "Beneficial multi-factor authentications, useful SSL VPNs, and simple initial setup". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Check Point Harmony Mobile and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whereas Ivanti Connect Secure is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, OpenVPN Access Server, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Ivanti Secure Access. See our Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Ivanti Connect Secure report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.