We compared Zabbix and Checkmk based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Zabbix stands out for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, customization options, and excellent customer service, while Checkmk is praised for its monitoring capabilities, reporting options, and ease of use. Zabbix users commend its performance and flexibility, while Checkmk users appreciate its ease of navigation and detailed reporting. Both products offer reasonable pricing and positive ROI, but Zabbix users suggest improvements in the user interface and integration capabilities, while Checkmk users seek enhancements in user-friendliness, documentation, alerts, and scalability.
Features: Zabbix stands out for its extensive customization options, while Checkmk impresses with its comprehensive reporting capabilities. In addition, Zabbix offers robust performance and intuitive dashboards, while Checkmk provides real-time insights and customizable reports.
Pricing and ROI: Zabbix offers a reasonably priced solution with a flexible licensing model, while Checkmk has found to be reasonable and affordable. Zabbix emphasizes a straightforward setup process, whereas Checkmk offers an easy setup process without any associated costs. Both products have received positive feedback from users regarding their setup cost., Zabbix users praise its performance and customization options, helping improve efficiency and prevent costly incidents. Checkmk users report significant improvements in monitoring efficiency and effectiveness, resulting in time and cost savings.
Room for Improvement: Zabbix users request improvements in user interface, documentation, customization options, and integration capabilities. Checkmk users express concerns about interface design, documentation, alerting system, scalability, and performance in larger networks.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews for Zabbix and Checkmk indicate that the time required to establish a new tech solution varies among users. Some users of Zabbix spent three months on deployment and a week on setup, while others required a week for both deployment and setup. Checkmk also had users reporting varying durations, with some taking three months for deployment and an additional week for setup, and others taking only one week for both. The context in which users use the terms "deployment" and "setup" should be considered when evaluating these timeframes., Zabbix's customer service is highly praised for their promptness, helpfulness, and strong commitment to resolving issues efficiently. Checkmk's customer service is appreciated for their prompt response, helpful assistance, and reliable solutions.
The summary above is based on 28 interviews we conducted recently with Zabbix and Checkmk users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."
"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."
"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."
"I really like the auto-discovery feature."
"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."
"I like being able to use proxy servers for different locations. The agents are pretty cool. They're easy to roll out. The standard out-of-the-box templates are also pretty easy to use. The integration with other learning products is also good. I have, in the past, used Slack, but we've integrated it with Microsoft Teams. We also use it for SMS with a service called Redcoat. It is very flexible. It does what I need it to do, and my manager is very happy because it doesn't cost anything. We are nearing 4,000 hosts inside Zabbix, and we've got another 6,000 access points to add to it. We've thrown everything at it, and it has managed to keep going. I am very impressed with the tool, and I'd shake their hand very hard if I got to say the compliments to the Zabbix team. They keep improving it and doing refreshes, which is one good thing about it. There is also online information as well as books that you can purchase if you're willing to read enough. There is a lot to pick up, but it is a pretty complete solution."
"Zabbix can use old data to current data to set the threshold. We can use previous data to set the threshold."
"The product is very stable."
"We use it to monitor and manage our servers."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring and the ease with which we can set it up at customer sites with our custom Zabbix proxy and tools."
"It's a flexible solution."
"Zabbix helps to save time."
"In terms of customization and integration, we have more flexibility. We can automate configurations, define deletion rules, and customize based on the needs. The client interface allows for further configuration, making it quite comprehensive."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."
"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."
"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."
"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."
"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."
"The only improvement I would suggest, revolves around its AI and ML capabilities."
"The reports are not great and should be improved."
"The graphical user interface could be customized a little bit more, and also the dashboard could be more friendly."
"Look and feel."
"When using this solution in enterprise monitoring, you are able to see that there are some issues with equipment that could be causing a problem. Sometimes you want to make a root command that you do not want to be executed automatically. What we have tried to do is open an SSH session directly from the solution's interface but it is not possible."
"Zabbix does not draw automatic mapping of the network, this is something they should add in the future. There is a lot of effort that is involved in tailoring some of the settings which could be made easier."
"In terms of user-friendliness, large maps could be more interactive. We should be able to click on some areas and move some objects. It would make it simpler to see things while analyzing some dedicated parameters."
"There are some features of Zabbix that are not good for reporting. The DX Spectrum solution has better reporting."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Checkmk is ranked 21st in Network Monitoring Software with 6 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. Checkmk is rated 8.6, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Checkmk writes "A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Checkmk is most compared with Icinga, Netdata, Centreon, Observium and Nagios XI, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core, Nagios XI and Amazon CloudWatch. See our Checkmk vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors, best Server Monitoring vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.