We performed a comparison between Corelight and Darktrace based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Corelight is easy to use."
"It's easy to create additional dashboards specific to supporting specific tasks."
"It's an easy way for us to get visibility in a client's environment."
"It is easy to deploy and easy to handle."
"The most valuable feature is the embedded IDS from Suricata."
"The solution is stable. We've never had any problems with it."
"I find the complete portfolio to be excellent."
"I particularly like Antigena and the analytics around the real-time monitoring of our network. I also like its reporting because it has got a seven-day reporting period within the system. Every time you run the reports, it gives you the data about the previous seven days. I like that because it is in real-time. I enjoy reading those reports and getting a very clear and decisive idea of what's happening on my network on a real-time basis. I like the actual real-time monitoring of spoofing and things like that. I also like the user monitoring as well as the network logging capabilities."
"It provides a comprehensive, detailed view of network activity and whatever is happening inside it."
"Ability to see events and exactly what traffic or website the device had tried to connect to that raised the alert or issue."
"The initial setup is simple."
"The most valuable feature of Darktrace is the AI that detects abnormal network activity."
"We liked their approach to identifying intrusions or network anomalies using AI."
"They can enhance the interface of the product. They can make it more interactive and also easier to use for feature access."
"Corelight hasn’t added features in a long time."
"Machine learning could be a good improvement, but it's very costly."
"In the next release, building a graphical user interface would be helpful."
"The solution’s architecture is complex and difficult to understand. There are multiple machines and VMs."
"There aren't so many third-party vendor platforms natively integrated with the platform."
"Upper management wasn't sold on the value proposition."
"It would be good if they can include some endpoint protection for remote workers. Nowadays, most people are working remotely. Therefore, they should include some type of sensors that can be installed on the endpoint in order to directly report the main usage and protect remotely. Phone protection will also be a great feature to add to Darktrace."
"It's a very complex platform."
"This product needs more in terms of prevention. The detection capabilities work well but once a threat has been detected, Darktrace should work to prevent it from doing anything malicious."
"It is expensive, but everything else has been great so far."
"Needs to improve its collaboration with local partners."
"The solution can improve the reporting."
Corelight is ranked 7th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 5 reviews while Darktrace is ranked 1st in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 65 reviews. Corelight is rated 9.0, while Darktrace is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Corelight writes "An open-source solution that gave us insight into our clients' network traffic flow ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Darktrace writes "Great autonomous support, offers an easy setup, and has responsive support". Corelight is most compared with ExtraHop Reveal(x), Vectra AI, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Arista NDR and SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, whereas Darktrace is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Vectra AI, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response. See our Corelight vs. Darktrace report.
See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.