We performed a comparison between CrowdStrike Falcon and ThreatQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)."Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"This is stable and scalable."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Falcon's best feature is its detection and blocking of threats."
"Scalability is good. We have had no issues with it."
"CrowdStrike Falcon's scalability is good. We have thousands of students using this solution."
"The most valuable feature is the indicator of compromise, which show you what file was either quarantined or removed."
"The detection is very effective."
"I have found the connection to search the hosts for detections very useful in CrowdStrike Falcon."
"The most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon is its accuracy."
"At this point what is most valuable is the interface, which is easy to navigate."
"Integrating the solution with our existing security tools and workflows was easy."
"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."
"The solution is not stable."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"We can do a threat analysis of any machine at any time, but that threat analysis is very limited."
"They need to strengthen the forensic capabilities of this product, for e-discovery."
"The product could be more accurate in terms of performance."
"For CrowdStrike to work, all the machines need to have an internet connection. This makes it challenging to assist customers without an internet connection. We would like to have a mechanism or relay to make this possible."
"If CrowdStrike can further expand its support for XDR compatibility, that would give it an edge over all the other competing new products."
"Tighter integration around XDR could be included."
"I would like to see a more accurate integration and an option to check the local machine."
"CrowdStrike Falcon sometimes wrongly flags things as malicious. Let's say a user is active on Chrome only. Sometimes, our cross-segmenting will fetch from the backend data and show that it is malicious because of memory or CPU utilization."
"The tool is not user-friendly."
"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."
CrowdStrike Falcon is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 110 reviews while ThreatQ is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. CrowdStrike Falcon is rated 8.6, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon writes "Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Improves the threat intelligence gathering process, but it is not user-friendly". CrowdStrike Falcon is most compared with Microsoft Defender XDR, Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.