We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and JenniferSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."It helps to show where the problem is and isolates the issue."
".NET core and Spring code level analysis helps with root cause analysis."
"The visibility that it provides through the application's behavior allows us to find trends based on our customized metrics."
"Dynatrace helped us with root cause analysis of poor performing components of our applications."
"We also use it in our performance testing. We found an issue that way, and we would have put that change live without Dynatrace. Finding that problem in "live", that would have been three or four days of investigation, whereas we found the issue, fixed the issue, reran the tests, all same day."
"Dynatrace helps to build business and non-business dashboards and the appropriate alarming on mail groups."
"I like the auto email alerting feature the most, as it is set up based on the application error or condition."
"We use the Dynatrace AI to assess impact. Because it links to real users, it is generally pretty correct in terms of when it raises an incident. We determine the severity by how many users it is affecting, then we use it as business justification to put a priority on that alert."
"The dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The integration of the tools is getting there. It is still not there yet, because we still have to get a lot of tools to put together."
"The functionality needs improvement."
"If we can gain more insight into older applications, using not-so-recent technologies, then it would be a plus."
"Add support for Ruby."
"There were a number of marketing promises that were made, which we do not see it in the tool yet. "
"You have got cloning at one level, but it would be nice to have cloning at deeper levels. Or, as you are doing the cloning, it would be nice if you could select different options. Then, you are not having to sit there and build dashboards, and spending a lot of time in the cloning area."
"The GUI has the most room for improvement. Sometimes, it can be a little cumbersome to find things and be able to create your own views, or be able to dig in and understand where things are."
"An additional feature that we could use is the rollover. If we could rollover to different datacenters, then it would satisfy our requirement. I.e., if one datacenter fails, then we could rollover to another datacenter."
"The solution is pricy and has room for improvement."
Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 342 reviews while JenniferSoft is ranked 52nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while JenniferSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JenniferSoft writes "Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas JenniferSoft is most compared with Grafana.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
