We performed a comparison between ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and Fortinet FortiGate IPS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."
"It is scalable."
"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiGate IPS is its efficiency."
"We use it to avoid unwanted traffic."
"Fortinet FortiGate's most valuable features are the UTM package which provides internet blocking restrictions and load balancing. Additionally, the solution is easy to use and the security reporting is good. The security fabric which they have launched Fortinet FortiGate IPS, it's very good in terms of giving details."
"The Fortinet FortiGate IPS has a good interface and integration."
"You have access to CLI in case you have no web access."
"The detection is great."
"FortiGate's SD-WAN capability is the most useful feature for us."
"Regionally, we are well covered. Technical support is good in this area."
"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."
"There needs to be more support."
"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."
"The solution could improve the integration."
"The system can slow down when inspections are carried out."
"We'd like to have multi-factor authentication via fiber."
"I have used technical support and they could improve."
"Integration with the antivirus companion Webroot is not seamless on Mac computers."
"The customization is a little bit difficult."
"The user interface needs a bit of upgrading."
"The graphical interface could be improved."
ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is ranked 23rd in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 3 reviews while Fortinet FortiGate IPS is ranked 4th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 54 reviews. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is rated 8.6, while Fortinet FortiGate IPS is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 writes "A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate IPS writes "Very stable with good network protection". ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is most compared with ExtraHop Reveal(x), Forescout Platform and Corelight, whereas Fortinet FortiGate IPS is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Cisco NGIPS, Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and Check Point IPS. See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Fortinet FortiGate IPS report.
See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.