We performed a comparison between Fiorano ESB and IBM Integration Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation."
"One of the most valuable features is the scalability. Whenever it's required, we can add more servers and scale. We can actually use specific servers for specific stuff. Unlike in other solutions, now we can implement one server purely dedicated to core-banking-related API. This is very important when it comes to the PCI DSS certification."
"The ability to compliment out-of-the-box integration components with small custom code."
"My favorite feature is the XML-based DFDL mapping, which is a tool that allows you to graphically map legacy data formats to modern data formats."
"It has the ability to be deployed without rewriting the code."
"The biggest advantage of this solution is that it is very easy to learn, and very easy to build applications."
"I use the integration of Kafka and the message flow, which is really good. It is also good for moving any file from one location to another. Using IBM Integration Bus in the data stage is pretty simple. You can see the preview and other things. The MQ server integrated with IBM Integration Bus is really great. I don't have to do a lot of configuration from that side. It is really good."
"Having the solution come from IBM you know you are receiving a product of quality in components and in the services, it is very good."
"The most valuable feature is that it is clear and easy to learn."
"The system's stability is the most valuable feature."
"It is a stable solution."
"Error logging is not very user-friendly. It requires the error logging to be configured in many different places."
"Fiorano ESB could be improved by becoming more user-friendly. Most of the pages and generated reports on API usage are already there, but they could be more user-friendly. There could be more selections added to generate reports. Overall, though, Fiorano suits all our needs and has good functionality."
"Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement."
"The version of the technology and current knowledge is a bit outdated."
"I would like to be able to run and install this solution on different platforms."
"This solution would benefit from improvements to the configuration interface."
"The tracing and debugging features are not up to date with more modern technology available."
"The price could be better. It would also be better if they simplified the code."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Sometimes migration takes too long."
"IBM doesn't really have a very strong community surrounding the product. Most of its direct competitors are open source solutions, and those have an excellent and well-developed community around the tech to help users navigate the ins and outs of the product. IBM is lacking in this area."
Fiorano ESB is ranked 10th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 5 reviews while IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 65 reviews. Fiorano ESB is rated 9.0, while IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fiorano ESB writes "Scalable and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "Scalable solution with efficient integration features". Fiorano ESB is most compared with Mule ESB and Oracle Service Bus, whereas IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Service Bus and IBM WebSphere Message Broker. See our Fiorano ESB vs. IBM Integration Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.