We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiSandbox and ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)."The scanner office document as well as PDF are useful. The most valuable thing is that you can emulate different operating systems without having the danger of getting something infected. It emulates several operating systems, and as a result, you either get the file or you don't get the file."
"FortiSandbox helps us handle unknown threats. Every vendor is competing for who can detect an unknown threat the fastest. Fortinet is competitive in the market."
"The real-time analysis capability of FortiSandbox is beneficial for email analysis."
"The product is great. It can be deployed on the cloud or on-premises."
"Overall, it works fine. Its interface is also fine."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox is scalable."
"It is a stable solution."
"The analysis engine is a very valuable feature."
"ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface."
"The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it."
"The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP."
"It's a solid platform and is stable enough. It is not complicated and is easy to use."
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pros →
"The initial setup is not too complex but could be easier."
"The delivery feature in my country is extremely bad."
"The licensing can be very confusing. It needs to be simplified."
"The reporting tools could be improved in Fortinet FortiSandbox."
"Product could include a user interface and be made simpler for customers to configure."
"It would be better if it had support for Mac and Linux."
"For the MSSPs, it would be great if the product could display all the threat chains on a dashboard since it is an area where the tool is currently lacking."
"Most people are confused about how to use the right integration of the right Fortinet product."
"They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community"
"Integration is an area that could use some improvement."
"It would be good to have more feeds and more integrated sources for enrichment."
"I couldn’t get any training videos online when I was working with the tool."
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Cons →
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiSandbox is ranked 5th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 36 reviews while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is ranked 4th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 4 reviews. Fortinet FortiSandbox is rated 8.2, while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSandbox writes "Light and powerful solution design; useful to have". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) writes "The tool could be integrated into any environment, but it was expensive, and the deployment process was complex". Fortinet FortiSandbox is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Trellix Network Detection and Response, Check Point SandBlast Network, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and Fortinet FortiEDR, whereas ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is most compared with Anomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future, ThreatQ, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Anomali Match.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
