We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and Salesforce Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's robust, and it has a wide reach in terms of office applications including storage."
"Google Cloud is very user-friendly."
"It's a perfect tool for startups."
"It eliminates capital expenditures and subsequent MNO that we would use to spend on on-prem architectures. That money is funneled towards security and connectivity provisioning."
"The solution scales well."
"Google Cloud has low downtime."
"It's available any time you need it."
"The solution is pretty stable."
"The process and the workflows are amazing."
"The reporting tools are very solid."
"The solution provides a preferred method of backing up data."
"The solution is very robust and easy to develop in."
"The presentation is clear and easy to comprehend."
"The scalability of the Salesforce Platform is good."
"Most of the apps allow you to try out the product before buying it. The trial period depends on the product and varies from a week to 30 days."
"The most valuable feature is ease of use."
"I would like to see some improvement in the accessibility features of this solution."
"We'd like the storage to be increased."
"It is complex to set up."
"The analytics that they have are very focused. It serves Google and not really the client."
"The price could improve. Every customer would agree, that they would like the price to be reduced."
"Current technologies keep on changing, so definitely those new changes need to be incorporated quickly. The competition is always out there to be one step ahead. How those open-source platforms can be easily integrated into the cloud, is going to be the key in the future."
"Google Cloud could improve by having better integration with other platforms."
"The storage available for this solution could be improved, especially compared to a solution like Microsoft which offers 1 TB of storage. Google cloud offers only 30 GB."
"The solution's UI is horrible."
"It may be slow, but that is relative. When compared to Siebel CRM, which was large, clunky, and extremely slow, Salesforce seemed fast to me."
"Reporting could be better. Reporting is Excel-based, and it has sucked since the inception of the company. That's why I was excited about the fact of them bringing MuleSoft into the fold and Tableau."
"The solution is a bit expensive."
"In Salesforce, every customer is unique and it's not possible to bundle them together effectively if they are from the same company or move companies, et cetera."
"Some business functionalities could be improved."
"Salesforce's mobile app could be better. Also, it could integrate more seamlessly with Gmail."
"The general reports could be made easier in the Salesforce Platform. Generating needs extensive training to know the exact structure of the design. Whenever you search for something you need to know what are the exact fields that you need to view. It's not an easy process to learn."
Google Cloud is ranked 5th in PaaS Clouds with 66 reviews while Salesforce Platform is ranked 8th in PaaS Clouds with 81 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while Salesforce Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Salesforce Platform writes "Reliable with good reporting and custom dashboards". Google Cloud is most compared with Alibaba Cloud, Linode, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP S4HANA on AWS, whereas Salesforce Platform is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Microsoft Azure, Appian and Mendix. See our Google Cloud vs. Salesforce Platform report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.