We performed a comparison between Hornetsecurity Email Spam Filter and Malware Protection and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, ESET and others in Anti-Malware Tools."Makes my inbox cleaner and more secure. The infomail is now neatly out of my view and I dont see all the junk I use to see when using AppRiver or just Microsofts native spam filter. I see only the things I need to see, and spoofed messages have decreased 100% throughout the organization."
More Hornetsecurity Email Spam Filter and Malware Protection Pros →
"With Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, if malware is attached to a mailer, it's very easy to go into the incident alert and find out what's happening with that identity and the mail."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection are the EOP, ATP, safe links, fishing, and antispam."
"It provides security to both on-premises and Azure infrastructures."
"We use the solution in all our environments. We use it for remedy tickets and give them updates. It was our main communication point."
"The initial setup of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection was easy."
"What I like most about Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is its integration with Windows, so we have one central view for all alerts and incidents."
"The solution's stability is very, very good. I didn't face any problems in the last year."
"The threat management feature includes policies and alerts that are valuable."
"If I had to pick my least favorite thing, I would say some of the tabs to control settings can get a little overwhelming. It can also be a little hard to read the font at certain times so possibly enlarging the details and text of the site a little to make it not so "fit" to the screen."
More Hornetsecurity Email Spam Filter and Malware Protection Cons →
"Not all settings can be configured automatically and most still require manual configuration. However, there is an automation tool available that can be used to input all the configurations either as a script or a tool it would be helpful."
"The solution needs to improve its backup."
"It doesn't protect against everything. We do need protection for, for example, endpoints."
"The tool's classification for bulk email is cumbersome."
"The licensing can be on the expensive side, especially in the cloud space."
"When you're using a Microsoft product solution, you can scale it, but if you're not, there are limitations."
"Some features, like encryption, are not available."
"The tool is not 100% stable."
More Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Hornetsecurity Email Spam Filter and Malware Protection is ranked 44th in Anti-Malware Tools while Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is ranked 11th in Anti-Malware Tools with 34 reviews. Hornetsecurity Email Spam Filter and Malware Protection is rated 10.0, while Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Hornetsecurity Email Spam Filter and Malware Protection writes "Has significantly secured our day to day operations and our emails internally and externally to our clients". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) writes "An effective email security solution that provides DLP, Safe Attachment, and Safe Links". Hornetsecurity Email Spam Filter and Malware Protection is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Bitdefender Security for AWS, whereas Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection, Cisco Secure Email, Fortinet FortiMail and Mimecast Email Security.
See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.