We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance is good."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"The main benefit of this product is the lifetime warranty, up to 99 years. For example, if your switch card fails after 10 years, and the hardware fails, it will be replaced with the very same switch or the equivalent model available at the time."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"The reliability is good."
"The tool is easy to manage."
"What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"There are numerous features, but what I like about Ruckus is that they have a good coverage range due to their BeamFlex technique."
"The initial setup of Ruckus Wireless WAN is very easy."
"The most valuable features are the ease of deployment, the coverage that it offers, and the reliability."
"The best feature of Ruckus Wireless WAN apart from its seamless roaming feature where you roam beautifully on the network is its analytics tool that gives you so much insight into your deployment, so it has become more of a business intelligence type of tool as well. I also like that Ruckus Networks, in terms of WiFi security issues on the WiFi protocols, is also the first company to give you notices of security issues, and also the first to provide patches for those issues. Ruckus Wireless WAN is very proactive and much, much faster than Cisco, Aruba, and Meraki."
"What I like best about Ruckus Wireless WAN is easy administration. After installation, you'll benefit from how easy it is to administer the product. I also like that the product can cover the whole area with just a few endpoints."
"Tech support is good."
"The actual wireless access points themselves are very powerful."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of adding an access point."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
"The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"The sales sync should connect with and sync up with the customers."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"The connectivity and mobility for users could be improved."
"The initial setup is complex."
"They could include a firewall feature in the next release but even there it's not really necessary"
"The solution needs to offer more analytics."
"The interface has to be more automated."
"The solution could be more stable."
"The product needs to improve its latency and performance."
"The support could be faster. It takes time for them to reply."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.