IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Multitenant comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
10,648 views|7,149 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
1,569 views|756 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Db2 Database and Oracle Multitenant based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Db2 Database vs. Oracle Multitenant Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of the IBM Db2 Database is security.""We had a crash of the backup system and the IBM DB2 was always up and consistent. It's robust, and for us, it was always up and running.""IBM Db2 was much cheaper as a package than using other products. This is because IBM supplied a package with its product. It's an application. So it was much more efficient and a stronger competitor in that regard.""The most valuable features are the simplicity of the database and the access to Db2 and Db2 information.""The most valuable aspect of this solution is its stability. We have never had any problems and have never had to contact technical support.""We are dealing with millions of transactions a month and the performance is very good.""It's a very mature product.""It is a scalable solution."

More IBM Db2 Database Pros →

"The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine.""Maintaining databases is a valuable feature for us.""You can scale the solution as needed.""The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature""The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database.""The most valuable features are the speed and ease of use.""Multitenant has a container database with many pluggable databases.""It's easy to use and works great."

More Oracle Multitenant Pros →

Cons
"Db2 interface could be improved a bit. Comparing it to Oracle, Db2's interfaces could be improved.""The pricing could be improved, it's expensive.""The problem with this environment is that any software that you install is very costly because there are no free tools for this environment.""The initial set up was complex.""The vendor should offer a free version""There are some issues with Db2's database file system not being readable. The storage could also be increased, and the monitoring could be improved.""The solution could be more modern and have updated database technology.""IBM's products tend to be quite costly, especially given the availability of free, open-source alternatives."

More IBM Db2 Database Cons →

"That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve.""The solution lacks a GUI for commands.""It can be complicated to scale up the solution, but it's scalable.""The user interface for this solution can be made better.""It would be beneficial to include this solution with Oracle Enterprise, but Oracle charges additional fees for it.""While the product is overall excellent, it is quite expensive.""Technical support could be faster.""This solution is a bit complicated when collecting from containers - that feature should be a bit better."

More Oracle Multitenant Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They are competitive and honest (compared to how peer firms approach licensing conversations). ​"
  • "Compared to Oracle, it is so much cheaper."
  • "Licensing fees are on a yearly basis."
  • "We don't see what the specific price of the DB2 license is because we pay for the backup license as a package."
  • "I think that everyone knows that with IBM the standard price is higher than the others."
  • "Db2 is less expensive than Oracle."
  • "We did not buy it. It came with our hardware without any complimentary maintenance. If I compare Db2 Database with Oracle Database, its price is lower than Oracle Database."
  • "There is a license for this solution and we pay every three years."
  • More IBM Db2 Database Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This solution is a little bit pricey."
  • "For me, I will go with it if I have the budget. Some features are nicer than before, but at the end of the day, you always have a limited budget. I prefer to upgrade and get a specific hardware when possible. At the end, you will have to make a compromise. You will not get everything you would have liked to have."
  • More Oracle Multitenant Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Db2 database scalability and performance capabilities match our database needs. It covers pretty much everything a database administrator or engineer might need.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. Since it's a government contract, the rates are negotiated and agreed upon with the government. So, it's not like the standard market price. It's not super… more »
    Top Answer:Db2 interface could be improved a bit. Comparing it to Oracle, Db2's interfaces could be improved.
    Top Answer:The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine.
    Top Answer:Oracle Multitenant is suitable mainly for large enterprises due to its high cost and resource demands. There are additional fees beyond standard licensing, which makes it expensive.
    Top Answer:While the product is overall excellent, it is quite expensive.
    Ranking
    Views
    10,648
    Comparisons
    7,149
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    470
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    1,569
    Comparisons
    756
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    337
    Rating
    9.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    DB2
    Oracle Pluggable Database
    Learn More
    Overview
    DB2 Enterprise for Linux, UNIX, and Windows is the ideal data server for the most demanding workloads. New XML support is designed to help firms minimize the time and effort it takes to persist and use their XML data reducing development costs and improving business agility.

    Oracle Multitenant - an Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition option – introduces a new architecture that enables customers to easily consolidate multiple databases, without changing their applications. This new architecture delivers all the benefits of managing many databases as one, yet retains the isolation and resource prioritization of separate databases. In addition, Oracle Multitenant enables rapid provisioning and upgrades, and fully complements other options including Oracle Real Application Clusters and Active Data Guard. p>

    For more information on Oracle Multitenant, visit Oracle.com

    Sample Customers
    Knorr-Bremse, Mizuho Bank Ltd., Australian Government Department of Defence, SCHWENK Zement, Friedhelm Loh Group, YAZAKI Europe Limited, Ekornes ASA, Baldor Electric, VSN Systemen BV, Lion Brewery (Ceylon) PLC, PLANSEE Group, TE Connectivity, Hansgrohe SE, Openmatics, University of Toronto
    An Post, National Oilwell Varco, SAS Institute, Sportmaster, Y-Telecom
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization53%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Government4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise57%
    Large Enterprise35%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Db2 Database vs. Oracle Multitenant
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Db2 Database vs. Oracle Multitenant and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Db2 Database is ranked 6th in Relational Databases Tools with 67 reviews while Oracle Multitenant is ranked 16th in Relational Databases Tools with 15 reviews. IBM Db2 Database is rated 8.2, while Oracle Multitenant is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM Db2 Database writes "Very scalable with high availability and excellent technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Multitenant writes "Databases are automatically upgraded and cloning of pluggable databases requires just one command ". IBM Db2 Database is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, SAP HANA and Teradata, whereas Oracle Multitenant is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, MySQL and SAP HANA. See our IBM Db2 Database vs. Oracle Multitenant report.

    See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.