We performed a comparison between IBM DevOps Test UI and Katalon Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."
"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"Whenever I speak to the support team of Katalon Studio, I learn that some new features will be included in the product. It is a scalable product."
"The tool has a good record and playback feature for functionality, which saves time when creating automated tests."
"I rate Katalon Studio's scalability a four out of five."
"We are now performing automated testing in 15 minutes, which were previously taking a long time when doing it manually."
"Our clients have requested by all types of testing, including mobile, desktop, and API testing and all of those are covered by Katalon. I find that very valuable, very complete."
"The most valuable features of Katalon Studio are its user-friendliness and the AI smart healing capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is that the browser and the API testing is available in a single tool, and I don't have to look at other options."
"One of the features that I like is Object Recognition. It worked very well, and it allowed me to create a dynamic expert based on my requirements."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."
"One aspect that can be improved is testing for desktop applications. I would like to see them support more technologies in this area."
"Katalon Studio should improve its usability, it still needs some improvement where users can easily use it to build their automation suite. It requires some initial work to set it up. There should be more keywords in the library to limit the coding requirements, this will allow a non-technical person easily start using it, which would be better."
"We have had some issues when it comes to stability, which is something that needs to be improved."
"The price of Katalon Studio is an area of concern where improvement is required."
"The solution can be further improved with better loading time."
"The product is comparatively slow."
"Now we are having difficulties in using it and had to limit our automation experts to the features that Katalon allows us to use for free. It was free access and they claimed that it would be free for all time."
"They need to work on documentation to make it more centralized and easier to find what you are looking for."
IBM DevOps Test UI is ranked 10th in Regression Testing Tools with 8 reviews while Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Regression Testing Tools with 42 reviews. IBM DevOps Test UI is rated 7.2, while Katalon Studio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM DevOps Test UI writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes " Functional automation features and the recording functionality saves time but the performance and script execution is slow ". IBM DevOps Test UI is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, HCL OneTest, Worksoft Certify and OpenText UFT One, whereas Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium. See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Katalon Studio report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.