We performed a comparison between IBM DevOps Test UI and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."
"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"The solution is script-less, so you don't need IT knowledge to use the solution in an operational way. This is the most valuable feature. It's also only one of two or three tools that can do good automation on SAP, and in my opinion, it's the best of those."
"This tool has test data management capability along with test management."
"Object Identification Wizard."
"I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We have enterprise-level customers."
"Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface."
"The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable."
"To me, what stands out the most about Tricentis Tosca is that even if I'm not a technical tester, I could pick up on how to use it very quickly because of the mechanisms of the tool, for example, its scanning mechanism. I'm not so technical, but I'm able to maneuver through Tricentis Tosca and derive capability. It's a user-friendly tool. It's not very complex."
"I am impressed with the product's script test."
"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"The solution needs to improve its simulation of mobile environments. Right now, that aspect is really lacking."
"I think the downside would be licensing costs which are very high."
"Their license management should be improved. One of our customers is a global customer. They want to use one licensed server and then split the licenses based on the different users of the different business units, but currently, there is only one license server that everybody can access. There is no control, and that's why sometimes congestion can happen."
"In Tosca, I see that there are no user guides."
"It is quite difficult to integrate the solution with other tools."
"I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories."
"The UI does not have the option of automating the scroll bars."
"I would like to see more implementation of AI on the self-healing aspect. That would be like the next step."
IBM DevOps Test UI is ranked 22nd in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 98 reviews. IBM DevOps Test UI is rated 7.2, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM DevOps Test UI writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". IBM DevOps Test UI is most compared with Katalon Studio, Selenium HQ, HCL OneTest, Worksoft Certify and OpenText UFT One, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim. See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.