We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Microsoft, Wazuh and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)."A nice benefit is when we go to the process of selecting our youth cases, they go by building blocks. QRadar links it to building blocks."
"The most valuable feature is the DSM Editor. The custom parsing tool is very nice, outstanding."
"The feature that I find the most useful is that IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is free of charge. It's a fully free product that can be installed on top of IBM QRadar SIEM."
"I think this is a good product for enterprises because of the performance and out-of-the-box rules and use cases. If they want to reach the maturity level early, they can use these out-of-the-box rules and use cases. That will help them a lot."
"I really like the feature we have with the logs, that if there are any credit card numbers being used, like a PII, you can just use rejects and you can mask it. This is a really good feature in QRadar."
"It is a bit easier to use than other products, such as Splunk or ELK Elasticsearch."
"The initial setup of QRadar is not complex because we have done it before and we are used to the development. It is getting easier all the time."
"What we like about QRadar and the models that IBM has, is it can go from a small-to-medium enterprise to a larger organization, and it gives you the same value."
"The security level that they are maintaining with the pre-authentication keys is very good."
More Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service Pros →
"There needs to be better integration with other applications."
"QRadar needs a lot of fine tuning"
"The architecture could be improved. I got stuck for a long time trying to understand the architecture, as it is quite challenging."
"There is a lot of manual configuration required in order for the product to run smoothly, and I think that it could be made more automatic."
"I'm not sure about the stability just yet. We've observed a few issues and we raised a supporting ticket for it."
"The user interface is a bit clunky, a bit hard to find what you need."
"Solution has too many menus that require going to two or three sub-monitors to enter the QRadar."
"Technical support could be improved by a bit."
"The solution could improve by providing better documentation for beginners to learn, such as videos or other tutorials."
More Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service Cons →
More Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 4th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 198 reviews while Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is ranked 43rd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service writes " Easy to install, highly secure standards, and reliable". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is most compared with AWS Security Hub, Microsoft Sentinel, LogRhythm SIEM, Exabeam Fusion SIEM and Rapid7 InsightVM.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors and best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.