We performed a comparison between IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor and SolarWinds NPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."
"Monitoring capabilities are at a high level and it is easy to see utilization, access ports, and CPU memory in real time or through a lens for long-term visualization."
"It combines and presents information from many different sources, giving a corporate-wide vision on a single pane of glass."
"Technical support is very helpful with our upgrades."
"The most valuable features are language support and technical support."
"The benefit of this solution is the reporting. We're able to report on and see our network in a graphical form. We are able to detect when a device is added to a network."
"SolarWinds NPM is a scalable solution since it can handle a huge number of users."
"There are a lot of options for customization of the dashboard, alerts, and reports."
"The connectivity of the solution is very good."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."
"My team has had a lot of issues with support."
"If they did some type of synthetic monitoring, it would have been better."
"The only real caveat that we have or that I have an issue with is when I go on vacation, it's a little hard for me to go and modify alerts so that I don't get alerted about things when I'm on vacation."
"Consolidation of platforms would provide a smoother experience."
"The solution does not offer much customization so is somewhat inflexible."
"SolarWinds NPM could improve by adding the deepest inspection, performance networking, and IP address discovery."
"I would like to see integration with antivirus or other security endpoint solutions."
"Currently lacks integration with SMS services."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
More IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is ranked 61st in Network Monitoring Software with 5 reviews while SolarWinds NPM is ranked 4th in Network Monitoring Software with 147 reviews. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is rated 8.0, while SolarWinds NPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor writes "It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds NPM writes "High-level, comprehensive, and proactive monitoring in a user-friendly interface". IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is most compared with , whereas SolarWinds NPM is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, ManageEngine OpManager, ThousandEyes and Entuity. See our IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. SolarWinds NPM report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.