We performed a comparison between Infinite Blue and Red Hat OpenShift based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The solution is simple. It's very easy to deploy, and there's no risk with sorting that out. It's very fast to develop the screens and the modelling."
"The most valuable feature of OpenShift is the security context constraint (SCC). The solution’s security throughout the stack is good. And security context constraints provide port-level security. It's a granular level of control, where you can give privileges to certain users to work on certain applications."
"It's cloud agnostic and the containerization and security features are outstanding."
"Security is also an important part of this solution. By default, things are running with limited privileges and securely confined to their own resources. This way, different users and projects can all use the same infrastructure."
"Its security is most valuable. It's by default secure, which is very important."
"Key features are WildFly, because it standardizes infrastructure and the git repository and docker. Git is essential for source code and Docker for infrastructure."
"Excellent GUI support, so one does not need to use the command line client for almost any tasks. Great support for building images directly from Git repositories with hooks."
"We are able to operate client’s platform without downtime during security patch management each month and provide a good SLA (as scalability for applications is processed during heavy client website load, automatically)."
"There is a quick deployment of the application, and we can scale out efficiently."
"The solution is expensive. They should try to improve their pricing strategy."
"If we can have a GUI-based configuration with better flexibility then it will be great."
"It could use auto-scaling based on criteria such as transaction volume, queue backlog, etc. Currently, it is limited to CPU and memory."
"We need some kind of a multi-cluster management solution from the Red Hat site."
"This is a fairly expensive solution."
"We experienced issues around desktop security, that stopped us implementing a new feature that had been developed."
"The software-defined networking part of it caused us quite a bit of heartburn. We ran into a lot of problems with the difference between on-prem and cloud, where we had to make quite a number of modifications... They've since resolved it, so it's not really an issue anymore."
"Its virtual upgrades are time-consuming."
"The solution needs to support the new features in Kubernetes more quickly."
Earn 20 points
Infinite Blue is ranked 39th in Rapid Application Development Software while Red Hat OpenShift is ranked 4th in PaaS Clouds with 54 reviews. Infinite Blue is rated 8.0, while Red Hat OpenShift is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Infinite Blue writes "A simple solution with an easy setup and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat OpenShift writes "Provides us with the flexibility and efficiency of cloud-native stacks while enabling us to meet regulatory constraints". Infinite Blue is most compared with Salesforce Platform, whereas Red Hat OpenShift is most compared with Amazon AWS, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, Microsoft Azure, Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and Google Cloud.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.