We performed a comparison between Inflectra Rapise and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."
"It's pretty straightforward to set up."
"Selenium web driver - Java."
"The ability to present your tests on a wiki page and hooking them up to the scripts/fixtures."
"Selenium HQ lets you create your customized functions with whatever language you want to use, like Python, Java, .NET, etc. You can integrate with Selenium and write."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The testing solution produces the best web applications."
"The most valuable features of Selenium HQ are it is open-source, has a good interface, and integrates well."
"Language support - since it supports Java and other programming languages it is easy to integrate with other systems."
"Ability to integrate with every other tool."
"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."
"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."
"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."
"There are some tiny issues with SeleniumHQ. For example, with respect to the scraping tests. Sometimes, a website will have some hidden items or blockages that inhibit us from extracting data directly. It would be beneficial if Selenium could extract that information."
"We can only use Selenium HQ for desktop applications which would be helpful. We are only able to do online based applications."
"There should be standardized frameworks to build automation."
"For now, I guess Selenium could add some other features like object communications for easy expansion."
"Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be."
"We do not have enough resources or enough people to employ and hire. So, I'm hiring whoever I find, and they don't always have enough technical knowledge to operate Selenium."
"I would like to see automatic logs generated."
"It would be awesome if there was a standalone implementation of Selenium for non-developer users."
Inflectra Rapise is ranked 22nd in Test Automation Tools with 7 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Regression Testing Tools with 103 reviews. Inflectra Rapise is rated 7.2, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Inflectra Rapise writes "The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Easy to use with great pricing and lots of documentation". Inflectra Rapise is most compared with Katalon Studio, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and Automation Anywhere (AA). See our Inflectra Rapise vs. Selenium HQ report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.