We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Oracle E-Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its user interface and ease of navigation are valuable."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is the flashback it quickly takes you to the data browser. Additionally, one of the newer tools is the orchestrator which is very good."
"There are numerous good features."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"The product has been stable so far."
"EnterpriseOne is stable and can be customized according to customer requirements."
"Their great technical support is one of the most valuable features."
"The GL and FAH modules have become real-deal players for an organization with many legacy systems that handle transactions and where there is a need to create accounting from these transactions."
"An integrated platform with an easy of integration to a third-party system."
"If I want to manage many parts of my organization, such as finances, proceedings, or supply chain I would typically need to buy many different solutions. However, with Oracle E-Business Suite, it is all that is needed. This ERP system has many modules."
"Valuable features include Ledger and Subsidiary, Operating Unit, and Inventory Organization and Location."
"It was very easy to integrate the product into our existing infrastructure."
"The technical ability to run runtime APIs is great."
"The new Subledger Accounting feature is very strong."
"The reporting has to be flexible or it will turn the end-user off."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"Needs better integration with IoT solutions."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"The initial setup of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is straightforward. However, it could improve."
"The simplicity of the user experience needs to be improved tremendously."
"Movement to the cloud should be supported. Product support still needs to be improved."
"There are some cycles in HR that are not straightforward."
"Standard reporting needs to be changed. Many of the standard reports look the same as they did in version 10.7, 20 years ago."
"Administration takes some effort. Administrating the technology stack is not so complex but application aware database administration and following the new methodologies like online patching can be a little complex and time consuming. Oracle should ease the administrators jobs and do some innovation on this administration area as well. Oracle Autonomous Database is Oracle's leading technology these days. Using a similar approach, application stack may become a little more self-managing."
"Some of my clients report that the overall ease of use could be simplified."
"The user interface could be better. It's not good because they made their interface all in one, and my customers don't want to use it. I have to customize the interface and personalize it to hide some fields on the screen. It has lots of information on the screen, and the user can't easily navigate it. It's very difficult to use. I think that Oracle should have something like best practices. They need to provide some patches to simplify the interface based on the industry niche. Because now we see everything on the same screen, but the users don't need all that information. It's complicated to use for end-users, and we have to spend more time training them. In the next release, I think they should implement most of the features in the mobile app. It should be better. Oracle didn't update their mobile application for a very long time. Connecting the mobile application is complicated."
"The implementation can take quite a bit of time."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews while Oracle E-Business Suite is ranked 5th in ERP with 141 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while Oracle E-Business Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle E-Business Suite writes "Offers valuable finance tools". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, PeopleSoft and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, whereas Oracle E-Business Suite is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, SAP ERP, Oracle HCM Cloud, NetSuite ERP and IFS Cloud Platform. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Oracle E-Business Suite report.
See our list of best ERP vendors and best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.