We performed a comparison between Juniper MX Series Routers and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"Juniper MX Series Routers are easy to configure and easy to back up."
"The most valuable feature is the standard routing protocol."
"The solution's main features are its security and ease of use."
"The solution is pretty easy to set up after a bit of training."
"The product is easy to use."
"We are able to easily build chassis with Juniper MX Series Routers."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper MX Series Routers is its exceptional policy management capabilities."
"I would say it is very user-friendly."
"It is easy to set up."
"The tool has impacted our company's network costs and productivity in a perfect manner and percentage-wise, I can say it is 120 percent."
"The most valuable feature is that it has better throughput than its competitors."
"A valuable aspect is its user-friendly configuration, making it accessible even for individuals with basic technical knowledge."
"The GUI is easy to use."
"There are a lot of features to control permitting or stopping packets in the network."
"It is user-friendly, reliable, and cheap."
"The beauty of MikroTik is that you have flexibility with the routing parts."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Juniper have addressed issues with the MX204, but it still has a limited number of interfaces. Ideally, it should support up to twenty or twenty-four interfaces to better serve smaller service providers. Additionally, the MX304 doesn't support subscriber management, also known as BNG, which I believe should be included."
"The security features could be better."
"The only thing that might need improvement would be the occasional downtime."
"Currently, I don't have specific concerns or ideas for improvement. Regarding functionalities, I appreciate the user interface of Juniper Elite. Additionally, I'm exploring the use of Juniper Routers in a Parliament environment, particularly with Baragon, and so far, I find it to be a valuable feature. We're currently facing an issue as we're in the process of building and dealing with the software, specifically transitioning from R2 to RC. It's like when there is an update in the routers, and in the process, there are chances to end up losing some of your settings. The challenge arises because the recommended configurations for RC do not align with our features, necessitating a reevaluation of many features. It would have been more efficient if the initial recommendation had been for RC, avoiding the need to redo our research. This has resulted in a loss of time for us, and we've encountered this situation multiple times."
"While it is challenging to pinpoint specific areas for enhancement, there is room for better support and updates for Ansible."
"The solution could improve by providing enhancements to built-in SDN or SDWAN."
"The price of this solution should be improved."
"The solution could improve by providing better training to allow more sales of the solution in the market."
"The solution does not yet offer a SaaS version."
"Antispam and antivirus features should be included in the future."
"The bulk efficiencies and the control of traffic could be a bit better."
"The packet filtering, user log data, and user access log could all be improved."
"Stuff that I'd like to be improved is really just training and documentation because I think the feature set is full. Another improvement I'd suggest is that their new, bigger releases should be a bit more stable."
"The RAM capacity offered by the product needs to be increased, as it is one area where the tool currently has some shortcomings."
"In medium to large sectors, there's a necessity for managing aspects like proxy firewalls."
"It happens that you may find your network is down, if you reboot the switch, they come up. However, sometimes, they reset themselves. That's a big issue."
Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews while MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is ranked 5th in Routers with 18 reviews. Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8, while MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MikroTik Cloud Router Switch writes "Easy to set up, user-friendly, and reliable". Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers and HPE Enterprise Routers, whereas MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, Arista Networks Platform, Meraki MS Switches and Ubiquiti UniFi Switches. See our Juniper MX Series Routers vs. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
