We performed a comparison between Keysight Oscilloscopes and Tektronix Oscilloscopes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Oscilloscopes solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The user interface has never been better. They improved it a few years ago with a more modern oscilloscope interface and it's easier to use, even for more junior people in our lab."
"The user interface is nice. It describes the output well, so it's easy to use."
"The user interface is very simple. Everyone can use it."
"It can go up to a very high frequency, up to 120 gigahertz. And the user interface is really good. It's really easy to navigate."
"We rely on the data and we make our design calls, risk-assessment, all based on the measurements that we take with the Keysight equipment."
"Their software and hardware are integrated, so we don't have to spend a lot of time processing the data."
"It's accurate, fast, has high bandwidth, and the PLTS is pretty convenient."
"The user interface is very good, very graphical. It provides a lot of help in using and operating it."
"It has very fast response with deep memory."
"Tektronix is robust and reliable. It's a hammer-resistant machine, a fact which is most important on our manufacturing floor."
"It is easy to handle, so everyone likes to use it."
"I haven't seen anything similar where it has a spectrum analyzer and regular scope together."
"The Ipath and measurements are fantastic and simple to implement."
"The Tektronix user interface is like an Apple iPhone, but for oscilloscopes. It is simple to use."
"Being able to monitor data from a CAN bus while the vehicle is running will cut down a lot of the feedback for the design mode."
"The user interface is good, not very complicated. It is very intuitive."
"There is a learning curve depends on the client that I am working with. E.g., if I'm working with a client, and they have a test and measurement equipment company, when I go to another company, the new company may not be using the same model."
"The user interface has a load of features that come with it, which is why it is an eight out of ten."
"There is room for improvement in the upgradeability of the products. When we buy a platform, we would like that platform to survive two or three generations, because it is very expensive. If they could provide a more modular type of design, so if we want to upgrade one functionality then we could upgrade that module, rather than all the equipment, that would be helpful. That modularity is something we would like to see."
"If the simulation runs for a long time, it will suddenly crash. If they can debug that, the product would be better."
"Sometimes, it's quite hard to get the technical support to come onsite. If we run into a hardware, measurement, or software issue, we may have to wait a long time for them to come."
"They can improve, but I don't know how."
"While the user interface is good with respect to instrumentation, but with respect to documentation, I do not like it. Its documentation is slightly bad. It was not organized properly. The way it's organized is very difficult to understand, so it takes lot of time to search for one thing in particular."
"I would like to see the possibility of interacting with the software, new features for software post-processing. For example, once you're done measuring, it would be nice to be able to generate some data starting from the measurement data."
"I wish we could turn off the automatic measurement feature of the oscilloscope, for teaching purposes."
"They need to add more memory to this machine."
"It needs one button and every time you push it, you get whatever you need."
"There are other devices out there which are more capable, offering more features, with as good quality tech support."
"I would like if they could have more customer support engagement."
"We would like more features for the CAN bus decoding, such as importing DDC files, which allows us to take the raw data and convert it into engineering units."
"On the source side, their AWGs don't have enough bandwidth. They need to increase the bandwidth of their AWGs, meaning they have to have a faster sample rate."
"If they could make the user interface even more intuitive that would help. If they could make it easier to read, to know where the buttons are, that's all I need."
Keysight Oscilloscopes is ranked 3rd in Oscilloscopes while Tektronix Oscilloscopes is ranked 2nd in Oscilloscopes. Keysight Oscilloscopes is rated 8.4, while Tektronix Oscilloscopes is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Keysight Oscilloscopes writes "We are able to easily record and save our test setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tektronix Oscilloscopes writes "High sampling rate enables it to clearly render the envelope". Keysight Oscilloscopes is most compared with Siglent, RIGOL Oscilloscopes, Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes, Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes and Anritsu Oscilloscopes, whereas Tektronix Oscilloscopes is most compared with Siglent, Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes, Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes, RIGOL Oscilloscopes and Yokogawa Oscilloscopes. See our Keysight Oscilloscopes vs. Tektronix Oscilloscopes report.
See our list of best Oscilloscopes vendors.
We monitor all Oscilloscopes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
