We performed a comparison between Meraki Dashboard and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The feature I find most valuable is the single pane of glass where you can configure a monitor view, all from one dashboard. For example, on the wireless side, you can configure it under the configuration panel, and then view statistics like location analytics, user analytics, etc."
"I would say the ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's very easy to set up and get up and running."
"I like that Meraki Dashboard is a user-friendly product."
"We've been spending a lot less time on tickets and deployments, so we have more time to do other things."
"The most valuable features are that it's easy to use and technically very complete. I can configure, do advanced troubleshooting in the dashboard, and reboot access points remotely."
"The most valuable feature is knowing the wireless and switch are healthy."
"There is no need to swap the hardware at all the locations, and importing the APs into the Dashboard was a simple and quick process."
"The most valuable feature of Meraki Dashboard is we can manage our switches and access point in one place."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."
"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."
"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."
"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."
"Key features for us are custom reporting, 95th Percentile, and trend lines."
"It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."
"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Price could be reduced."
"If I am a user and I have a seat on the fourth floor, if I move across the building, the system should be able to track me and should be able to figure out my whereabouts or my position within the building if I'm connected to the wireless. That would make the administrator's life easier in terms of reachability."
"The solution has a limited routing table and needs improvement by increasing the numbers as well as providing a summarization for the table."
"We would like to be able to test the health of WAN connections."
"The tool needs to incorporate more integration platforms. Integrating technical support features directly into the dashboard would be highly beneficial. This would allow technicians to troubleshoot issues more efficiently."
"Third-party switches do not necessarily integrate easily with the system and this could be improved to allow for better adaptation."
"There is a bit of a problem when you try to log in and you don't have a fixed IP address. If you're granting access, you need to log in by using the IP address. If your administrator's IP address is not a fixed IP address and it has changed, you might need to update the changed IP address in the interface. For this, you need to log in to the interface to update the IP address. This issue might not have so much to do with Meraki interface."
"You can't really clone or replicate a device, that sort of feature would be useful. You can clone the site but you cannot clone the device."
"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."
"The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades."
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."
"With Statseeker I'd like to see some flow, i.e. what's tuning-up the network. The trend I like is managing the traffic load by going to the cloud."
"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."
"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."
"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Meraki Dashboard is ranked 9th in Network Monitoring Software with 51 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. Meraki Dashboard is rated 8.6, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Meraki Dashboard writes "Incredibly easy to use, great troubleshooting and prevention of malicious events". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". Meraki Dashboard is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds NPM, ThousandEyes, Mist AI and Cloud and Zabbix, whereas Statseeker is most compared with . See our Meraki Dashboard vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.