We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Pillir based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Time to market is most valuable because you can make apps pretty fast. It also has pretty good integration."
"For our purposes, it is quite scalable."
"It's very easy to build an app using this solution."
"We were impressed with the functionality of the solution."
"The solution is very good. It's very full. You can do almost anything."
"It's a very workable solution because it's an automated way of making applications. You have a template, you have the application know-how,"
"The most valuable feature is automized processes."
"The most valuable features are low-code and fast development."
"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."
"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."
"The solution should have more integration with other platforms."
"We would like to see some improvement in the cost of the solution when an organization has a more complex network structure. The advanced connectors are very expensive, which discourages our customers from implementing it."
"It has to improve the threshold limit where it can handle data beyond 5000 items."
"Technical support could be faster, and more accurate."
"The flexibility of the user interface could be better."
"The flexibility and the user interface need improvement."
"We'd like to see more integration capabilities in the future."
"The scalability of the solution could improve."
"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."
"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews while Pillir is ranked 42nd in Rapid Application Development Software. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Pillir is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pillir writes "Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Pillir is most compared with . See our Microsoft Power Apps vs. Pillir report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.