We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and Oracle Integration Cloud Service (OIC) based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Mule Anypoint slightly nudges ahead of Oracle Integration Platform in this comparison, as Mule Anypoint offers very good API management. Users can easily define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them as desired. OIC’s payload and file polling limitations are some of the features that prevent the solution from being more competitive in the marketplace.
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"It can scale."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"I particularly like the drag-and-drop feature for designing integrations and processes."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces."
"The OIC is very good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the SFTP adapters, file adapters, and risk adapters, that we use in everyday projects."
"OIC's accuracy is quite good."
"The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like us"
"The initial setup is easy."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"The stability could be better."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"The solution is expensive."
"They should provide tutorials for beginners to learn about the processes."
"They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners"
"Now the platform is not built in a way that you can define."
"Dealing with the large file size has occasionally been a challenge."
"Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced."
"Lacks features for more complex integrations."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 41 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate, Azure Data Factory and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.