We performed a comparison between N-able Take Control and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Take Control enables you to collaborate with end users. It's for supporting a workstation where you want the person on the other side to see you moving their mouse, and you can work with them."
"The most valuable part of N-able Take Control is being able to remotely access your customer's site. You are able to view their network. Once you have it set up, it's always available. N-able Take Control can be used even when other remote access controls have been made."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is its ease of use."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is the remote access connection. Additionally, it is easy to use."
"The most valuable features of TeamViewer are the ease of connecting to remote computers. I do not need a lot of information about their computers to connect, a nontechnical person can give me the information needed for me to connect. Additionally, the solution does not gather other system information about the host or client's systems as other solutions might, such as AnyDesk."
"The product and platform work well. That is why I have stay with them so long. The stability has typically been good."
"It saves trips to customer sites, which saves time. I am able to get in there remotely and fix things."
"Our computers are spread amongst six physical locations. TeamViewer reduces the need to travel to those offices to help staff."
"I have been satisfied with TeamViewer overall."
"The product is easy to install."
"We've seen some latency problems in AWS environments. Aside from that, it's a pretty solid service."
"The dashboards I do not use because there are issues. The solution monitors your antivirus and other programs but it does not seem to work well."
"We'd like to be able to work from mobile to desktop and vice versa. We'd like more mobility."
"The security could improve in TeamViewer."
"It needs to have proper authentication. I would like to see in-depth integration with Google and Microsoft products, for example. It would be nice to have a cell phone version as well."
"Some of the additional features, like the meeting stuff, is making it too cluttered."
"I would like to see something like a TeamViewer mobile application for iOS or possibly Android. I think this would be fantastic given how technology is evolving today. It would be beneficial to use it with your smartphone."
"The product can sometimes crash."
"TeamViewer could improve by having support for other operating systems, such as Linux."
"This solution could be improved by offering more flexibility in terms of usage."
N-able Take Control is ranked 19th in Remote Access with 2 reviews while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 85 reviews. N-able Take Control is rated 9.0, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of N-able Take Control writes "Valuable remote access feature, highly stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". N-able Take Control is most compared with Dameware Remote Support and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online and Check Point Remote Access VPN. See our N-able Take Control vs. TeamViewer report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.