NGINX App Protect vs StackPath WAF comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
F5 Logo
3,410 views|2,539 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
StackPath Logo
210 views|159 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NGINX App Protect and StackPath WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The policies are flexible based on the technologies you use.""It has the best documentation features.""It's very easy to deploy.""NGINX App Protect is stable.""The most valuable feature is that there is a link in the system that will help to analyze the security of an application when something abnormal is found.""NGINX App Protect has complete control over the HTTP session.""The initial setup was simple and took three to four days.""The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is its flexibility."

More NGINX App Protect Pros →

"The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites."

More StackPath WAF Pros →

Cons
"The dashboard could provide a more comprehensive view of the status of the connections.""NGINX App Protect would be improved with integration with Shape and F5 WAF, which would make it easy for users to manage all their web application security with a single solution.""Right now, the tool doesn't provide an option revolving around update feeds, specifically the signature update option in the UI.""Currently, the policies have to be handled manually, and you have to create from scratch, which can be a bit time-consuming, in a large environment.""As far as scalability, it takes a long time for deployment.""The price of NGINX App Protect could improve.""Its technical support could be better.""They could provide a better user interface."

More NGINX App Protect Cons →

"The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement."

More StackPath WAF Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative."
  • "Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."
  • "Really understand the licensing model, because we underestimated that."
  • "There are no additional fees."
  • "NGINX is not expensive."
  • "The pricing is reasonable because NGINX operates on an instance basis."
  • "There is a license needed to use NGINX App Protect."
  • "There are not any additional costs we had to pay to use NGINX App Protect."
  • More NGINX App Protect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution has yearly, three-year, and five-year subscriptions.
    Top Answer:NGINX App Protect could provide a better user interface.
    Top Answer:The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites.
    Top Answer:The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement. It could provide high security to handle large traffic volumes for multiple websites.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,410
    Comparisons
    2,539
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    334
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    210
    Comparisons
    159
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    263
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    NGINX WAF, NGINX Web Application Firewall
    StackPath Web Application Firewall
    Learn More
    StackPath
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:

    • Integrating security controls directly into the development automation pipeline
    • Applying and managing security for modern and distributed application environments such as containers and microservices
    • Providing the right level of security controls without impacting release and go-to-market velocity
    • Complying with security and regulatory requirements

    NGINX App Protect offers:

    • Expanded security beyond basic signatures to ensure adequate controls
    • F5 app‑security technology for efficacy superior to ModSecurity and other WAFs
    • Confidently run in “blocking” mode in production with proven F5 expertise
    • High‑confidence signatures for extremely low false positives
    • Increases visibility, integrating with third‑party analytics solutions
    • Integrates security and WAF natively into the CI/CD pipeline
    • Deploys as a lightweight software package that is agnostic of underlying infrastructure
    • Facilitates declarative policies for “security as code” and integration with DevOps tools
    • Decreases developer burden and provides feedback loop for quick security remediation
    • Accelerates time to market and reduces costs with DevSecOps‑automated security

    StackPath WAF integrates multiple technologies, including Advanced Browser Validation and IP Reputation and Custom Rules engines, into an intelligent firewall that can be customized to meet your specific protection profile.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Robotics Cats, Jewlr
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Comms Service Provider33%
    Insurance Company17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise60%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    NGINX App Protect is ranked 15th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 19 reviews while StackPath WAF is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. NGINX App Protect is rated 8.2, while StackPath WAF is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of NGINX App Protect writes "Capable of complete automation but is costly ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StackPath WAF writes "Stable product with an easy setup process ". NGINX App Protect is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas StackPath WAF is most compared with AWS WAF and Sucuri.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.