We performed a comparison between Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to."
"The solution is easy to manage. You can get everything in a single platform. It is also easy to work with Terraform as a code."
"The product integrates well with our infrastructure."
"The solution is embedded in the hypervisor and there are no deployment costs."
"We can do a lot of provisioning."
"The technical support is excellent."
"The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring and logging functionalities."
"The architecture is the best. The solution is scalable if you are on a container-based solution."
"The software is user-friendly and straightforward to use, which is favorable to a developer."
"The usability and the developer experience. The platform has a centralized consultant that is easy to use for our development, operations and security teams."
"Openshift is a very developer-friendly product."
"On OpenShift, it's easy to scale applications. We can easily scale up or scale down."
"The stack in the software supply chain is one of the main reasons that we use OpenShift. When I came to this company, we bought hardware from IBM named Bluemix, and they used ICP, which stands for IBM Cloud Private."
"Centralized control of container resources is most valuable."
"I would like to have more nodes for availability and storage."
"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."
"There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network."
"Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability."
"The product lacks some virtualization capabilities, making it an area for improvement where the solution can focus on providing users with more virtualization capabilities related to disk systems."
"I have issues with the product's interoperability."
"We need a backup of production clusters."
"In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling."
"In my experience, the issues are not always simply technical. They do stem from technical challenges, but they struggle with the topic of adoption. When you encounter all of the customer pull, there are normally several tiers of your client pop that can adopt either the fundamental features or a little more advanced ones. The majority of the time, the challenge is determining how to drive adoption, how to sell the product to the customer, and how much time they can spend to really utilize those advanced features. If we get into much more detail, but this is from my perspective as the platform engineer and not the end customer, the ability of the end user to be able to debug potential issues with their application That is arguably the most important, let's say, work throughput in my area."
"Getting the solution quickly and troubleshooting quickly are both areas where I think it needs some work."
"I believe that the documentation part is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Whenever we onboard or deploy services that talk to Oracle Database, they take a lot of time to become active and serve the incoming request, so it would be good to see some improvement here. This could be an OpenShift issue or an internal network problem within our organization."
"My impression is that this solution is pretty expensive so I think the pricing plan could improve."
"OpenShift Container Platform needs to work on integrations."
"The solution needs to introduce open ID connect integration for role-based access control."
"I believe OpenShift Container Platform can improve in networking, architecture, and cloud areas by reducing deployment time, lowering costs, and streamlining engineer resources"
More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is ranked 12th in Container Management with 9 reviews while Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 1st in Container Management with 39 reviews. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is rated 7.6, while Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE writes "Stable platform with an easy initial setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform writes "Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime". Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, NGINX Ingress Controller, Rancher Labs and Docker, whereas Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Amazon Elastic Container Service, Rancher Labs and Kubernetes. See our Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
