We performed a comparison between OneTrust GRC and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We receive notifications or cases and prioritize them accordingly, which helps us address issues promptly."
"As a solution for IT risks, it is a very good product."
"We have data from Jira regarding addiction related to Europe as well as California. Additionally, we have data related to the Indian Data Protection Bill. Therefore, GDPR compliance is highly beneficial."
"One of the valuable features of this solution is it has the ability to review fourth and fifth parties to the nth degree."
"It does help in the automation of our privacy impact assessments."
"The product helps us streamline audit and incident management processes."
"OneTrust GRC is stable."
"OneTrust GRC offers policy management, including documentation, distribution, attestation, and policy management."
"First of all, its access control feature where it provides application level access, solution level access, and even recall access, as well."
"Integration is another great aspect of RSA Archer. From the beginning, integration has been a central focus for RSA, and Archer has always integrated well with most tools on the market today."
"This solution helped us with the centralization of our governance data, so we could house all of our controls in one place. We could use that central repository of all our controls to build our risk management strategy and our policy and governance. So we could use controls as a central library and build policy, and then build risk management around it."
"The most valuable part of the product is the ease-of-use and the opportunity to create custom security applications easily."
"Even non-technical people can be masters of the product."
"The integrated data model of a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship is quite useful."
"The most valuable feature is the enterprise module, which provides the capability of having all of the information stored and linked with everything else."
"The Advance Workflow feature simplifies things."
"There are limitations to customized workflow automation, and they need to increase both the available automation and the customized workflow."
"The product is not that easy to set up."
"They could improve by offering free help. A solution, a lot of times, is not just the use of the solution. For example, it is the overall engagement, how well do they support the system, what is their SLA, and how long their response time is to an issue. It would be beneficial if they had some type of professional services where they offer the first five hours of professional services a year for free. That would be a substantial benefit rather than having to buy professional services or professional services packages."
"I haven't seen any return on investment using the solution. If I had the opportunity, I would use a different solution."
"There are several areas for improvement. One is the integration capability. Connecting various DSAR systems can be time-consuming if a single integration takes months to complete."
"The Vendor Risk dashboard is quite basic today and not interactive, but improvements are in coming the next releases."
"OneTrust GRC's workflows aren't automated and need to be manually driven."
"We encounter difficulties creating multiple platforms or interfaces and manual processes for changing certain settings."
"When we have to do formulas or some other type of calculation in Archer, it sometimes doesn't work correctly. The fields don't display right, and we have to contact RSA Archer support to fix things. I think the calculation components are a bit complicated."
"The ticket handling process could be improved."
"Slow turnaround time from support team."
"It would be nice if RSA Archer featured more customization. When customers are updating, they should be notified whether certain updates are optional. The install screen should not proceed to the next page unless we make some selections about which updates we want to install."
"The financial area of RSA Archer has room for improvement."
"Its customization features could be better."
"The solution can be a little slow due to the Silverlight feature."
"I would like to see real-time data, from vulnerabilities, and threats."
OneTrust GRC is ranked 4th in GRC with 9 reviews while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. OneTrust GRC is rated 8.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OneTrust GRC writes "Effective privacy management, but the technical support could improve, and it is difficult to implement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". OneTrust GRC is most compared with ProcessUnity, AuditBoard, Workiva Wdesk, LogicGate and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance, Workiva Wdesk and Snow Governance & Risk. See our OneTrust GRC vs. RSA Archer report.
See our list of best GRC vendors and best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.