We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and OpenText Silk Performer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools."I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."
"The solution supports a number of protocols."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly."
"For me, the test coverage and the performance and load testing aspects are valuable."
"LoadRunner Enterprise's most valuable features are load simulation and creating correlation for parameters."
"It is pretty easy to do test execution and results analysis. When it comes to scenario settings, LoadRunner Enterprise has an extra edge over other testing tools in the industry. The scenario setup is easy, and in terms of execution, we have a clear idea of what is happening"
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is recording and replaying, and the fact that there are multiple options available to do this."
"The tool's most valuable features are scripting, correlations, and parameterization. Debugging is also easy."
"A good monitoring tool, simple to script and easy to configure."
"Micro Focus's technical support could be more responsive."
"Canned reports are always a challenge and a question with customers because customers want to see sexy reports."
"New features have been added in latest version and need to be improved with the DevOps integration."
"The installation has not been straightforward, and we have had so many problems. We have had to re-install, try to install on a different machine, etc. We have not been able to launch the LRE server itself yet."
"In Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, I need to spend a lot of time training people, while on other low-code or no-code platforms, I need not invest that much time."
"I think better or more integration with some of the monitoring tools that we're considering."
"I have seen some users report some issues, but I have personally not had any issues."
"While the stability is generally good, there are a few strange issues that crop up unexpectedly which affect consistent use of the product."
"If you have a large amount of data, the solution can struggle."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Load Testing Tools with 81 reviews while OpenText Silk Performer is ranked 11th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.4, while OpenText Silk Performer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Saves time and effort, and makes it easy to set up scenarios and execute tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Silk Performer writes "Scripting and basic test executions are good features; configuring the workload for tests is easy". OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, Tricentis NeoLoad, Apache JMeter and OpenText ALM / Quality Center, whereas OpenText Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.