We performed a comparison between Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."
"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."
"The tool is very easy to use."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."
"It is very stable."
"OutSystems' best feature is that you can build tests with the flow, so even the tests are made in the PDD framework in a low-code way."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it allows users to easily build applications."
"It is easy to use."
"The technical support is perfect."
"The most valuable feature is Agile development. I love that you save a lot of time on development and can focus on logic and business requirements."
"The drag-and-drop feature is very valuable."
"One thing I like about OutSystems is that there's no lock-in. You can keep running your applications because it's on .NET and hosted centrally. That's one of the advantages I see there in terms of not having an IT strategy that has a dependency on a particular platform."
"The tool has minor bugs."
"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."
"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."
"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."
"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."
"The asynchronous processing and multithreading tasks for which the current resources of the platform are very generic and not built for the end-user. Any asynchronous jobs have to be constructed with an end-user dashboard to allow inspection of the status of the activities."
"The solution's testing framework needs to be improved, and the workflow should be slightly more mature."
"OutSystems does not provide any native reporting resources. All reports must be created with other tools or as a webpage."
"We have performance issues while fetching bulk data."
"The PDD framework can't be used for the behavioral-driven development way of working."
"The tool needs to improve the efficiency of its widgets."
"The product's high price is an area of concern, where improvements are required."
"The latest version of the app generation tools could be more user-friendly."
More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 15th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 5 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 2nd in Low-Code Development Platforms with 46 reviews. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Studio Creatio, Microsoft Power Apps, Microsoft Azure and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX). See our Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.