We performed a comparison between OutSystems and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."Once built, web/mobile components can be reused in all new developments. In addition, the OutSystems Forge is very useful. We can exchange components and even already-built applications, reducing costs to build specific solutions."
"The product is mostly stable."
"For me, the most valuable feature is the flexibility the tools give us to change any customer requirements on the fly, when we are in a meeting. I also like how easy it is to deploy the code between environments and how easy it is to integrate OutSystems with other systems."
"The technical support is perfect."
"OutSystems' best feature is that you can build tests with the flow, so even the tests are made in the PDD framework in a low-code way."
"We can quickly develop an application using the tool."
"You can go huge - so it is definitely a scalable solution."
"The most important features of this tool are its visual modeling capabilities and drag and drop functionality. You can see what you are coding which makes it easy to understand and maintain. They have also created a big revolution in digital transformation by introducing native mobile app development under the same IDE."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"I like the OutSystems platform. I am working on integrating it with another platform using APIs, however, it has proven to be difficult. The main issue I am facing is obtaining authorization tokens as well as access and refresh tokens. It may be due to my lack of knowledge of APIs as it is new to me."
"It is hard to find the logic in OutSystems. From an improvement perspective, I want to be able to properly use logic in OutSystems."
"The latest version of the app generation tools could be more user-friendly."
"Since we first started using OutSystems, they switched their language support from Java and .NET to .NET only, which was a bit of a surprise. Their language support could be better in this sense, although on our resource side it is now a bit more flexible."
"The solution's testing framework needs to be improved, and the workflow should be slightly more mature."
"OutSystems could improve by being more like GitHub. It would be more helpful for us for division management and version control for our application."
"There are not enough resources on the market."
"The product's high price is an area of concern, where improvements are required."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 46 reviews while Unqork is ranked 25th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. OutSystems is rated 8.4, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and QuickBase, whereas Unqork is most compared with Pega BPM, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps, Salesforce Platform and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.