We performed a comparison between Tenable.io Container Security and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Tenable.io Container Security excels at identifying vulnerabilities and resolving deployment misconfigurations. Prisma Cloud provides extensive visibility, robust management options, and a diverse set of security functionalities for multi-cloud and hybrid-cloud environments. Tenable.io Container Security needs enhancements in auto-remediation, asset visibility, and compliance customization. Prisma Cloud requires improvements in dashboards, query building, correlation, and automation.
Service and Support: Customers have experienced difficulties with Tenable's customer service and support. Some customers said Palo Alto provided excellent, helpful, and responsive support. However, a few customers were dissatisfied with slow response times and a lack of satisfactory resolutions.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Tenable.io Container Security is considered straightforward with the support of helpful guidebooks. Reviewers had varied experiences when setting up Prisma Cloud. They said it can be easy or challenging depending on the organization's requirements. It typically takes users one or two weeks to deploy Tenable.io, while the deployment time for Prisma Cloud depends on the complexity of the environment.
Pricing: The cost of Tenable.io Container Security is determined by the number of pages in the application. Some users said that Prisma Cloud is reasonably and competitively priced, while others view it as expensive but essential for the benefits it offers.
ROI: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has demonstrated its effectiveness in preventing breaches, enhancing risk understanding, and decreasing security expenses. Users offered limited feedback on Tenable's ROI.
Comparison Results: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is the preferred choice over Tenable.io Container Security. Prisma Cloud offers extensive visibility and management features. Users like Prisma Cloud's powerful anomaly detection, integration, and coverage of multi-cloud and hybrid environments. Prisma Cloud stands out due to its easy configuration, integration with DevSecOps pipelines, and comprehensive security capabilities.
"It used to guide me about an alert. There is something called an alert guide. I used to click on the alert guide, and I could read everything. I could read about the alert and how to resolve it. I used to love that feature."
"With PingSafe, it's easy to onboard new accounts."
"It is very straightforward. It is not complicated. For the information that it provides, it does a pretty good job."
"The solution is a good alerting tool."
"The real-time detection and response capabilities overall are great."
"PingSafe released a new security graph tool that helps us identify the root issue. Other tools give you a pass/fail type of profile on all misconfigurations, and those will run into the thousands. PingSafe's graphing algorithm connects various components together and tries to identify what is severe and what is not. It can correlate various vulnerabilities and datasets to test them on the back end to pinpoint the real issue."
"It saves time, makes your environment more secure, and improves compliance. PingSafe helps with audits, ensuring that you are following best practices for cloud security. You don't need to be an expert to use it and improve your security."
"PingSafe's most valuable feature is its unified console."
"The product is quite good for providing multi-clouds or cross-cloud security from a single-pane -of-glass."
"Prisma Cloud also provides the visibility and control you need, regardless of how complex or distributed your cloud environments become. It helps to simplify that complexity. Now we know what the best practices are, and if something is missing we know."
"It supports the multi-cloud environment beautifully."
"Prisma Cloud's monitoring features such as the compute compliance dashboard and the vulnerability dashboard, where we can get a clear visualization of their docker, have also been valuable. We can get layer-by-layer information that helps us see exactly where it's noncompliant. They update the dashboards quite frequently."
"We were pleased with Prisma's custom and built-in reports. We could go into the dashboard and see all these notifications telling us which subscriptions didn't have TLS 1.2 enabled. The security controls were the most valuable features."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability monitoring, serverless access, container runtime features, and Defender."
"Integration is very easy. And because it supports security that spans multi- and hybrid-cloud environments, it's very easy to use."
"Prisma Cloud's inventory reporting is pretty good."
"Nessus scanner is very effective for internal penetration testing."
"The strong security provided by the product in the container environment is its most valuable feature."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, it is a good solution."
"Currently, I haven't implemented the solution due to its deprecation by the site. However, I can highlight some benefits of Tenable Cloud Security, a cybersecurity solution with various features for scanning vulnerabilities in both cloud environments and on-premises container security."
"It helps us secure our applications from the build phase and identify the weaknesses from scratch."
"Tenable.io detects misconfiguration when you deploy a Docker or Kubernetes container. It's much better to remedy these issues during deployment instead of waiting until the container is already in the production environment."
"The tool's most valuable feature is scanning, reporting, and troubleshooting."
"I would like PingSafe to add real-time detection of vulnerabilities and cloud misconfigurations."
"With Cloud Native Security, we can't selectively enable or disable alerts based on our specific use case."
"We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks."
"The Automation tab is an add-on that doesn’t work properly. They provide a list of scripts that don’t work and I have asked support to assist but they won’t help. When running on various endpoints the script doesn’t work and if it does, it’s only a couple. There are a lot of useful scripts that would be beneficial to run forensics, event logs, and process lists running on the endpoint."
"We are experiencing problems with Cloud Native Security reporting."
"There is no break-glass account feature. They should implement this as soon as possible because we can't implement SSO without a break-glass feature."
"The could improve their mean time to detect."
"There's an array of upcoming versions with numerous features to be incorporated into the roadmap. Customers particularly appreciate the service's emphasis on intensive security, especially the secret scanning aspect. During the proof of concept (POC) phase, the system is required to gather logs from the customer's environment. This process entails obtaining specific permissions, especially in terms of gateway access. While most permissions for POC are manageable, the need for various permissions may need improvement, especially in the context of security."
"In terms of improvement, there are some small things like hardening and making sure the Linux resources are deployed well but that's more at an operational level."
"Prisma is good about compliance, and their support is excellent, but they struggle with automation and integration. They need to stay on top of the newest types of connectors. How can you connect other applications and other tools in order for this to work cohesively? That's a challenge."
"The area for improvement is less about the product and more about the upsell. If we've already agreed that we'd like your product x, y, or z, don't try to add fries to my burger. I don't need it."
"The pricing for the solution needs improvement."
"We identified two things that we felt would be great to have, but they are under NDA. So, I can't disclose them. Other than those two things, we identified a generic bug in the secret key management service on AWS that needs to be fixed. We reported it to them, and we want them to fix it."
"It would be ideal if they could somehow reduce the deployment time."
"The IM security has room for improvement."
"The automation must continue to become much smoother."
"The initial setup is highly complex."
"I feel that in certain areas this product has false positives which the company should work on. They should also try to include business logic vulnerabilities in the scanner testing. Finally, the vulnerability assessment feature should be increased to other hardware devices, apart from firewalls."
"The stability and setup phase of the product are areas with shortcomings where improvements are needed."
"They need to work on auto-remediation so it's easier for the security team to act quickly when certain assets or resources are deployed. The latest version has a CIS benchmark that you need to meet for containers in the cloud, but more automation is needed."
"Tenable.io Container Security should improve integration modules. It should also improve stability."
"The support is tricky to reach, so we would like better-oriented technical support enabled."
"I believe integration plays a crucial role for Tenable, particularly in terms of connecting with other products and various container solutions like Docker or Kubernetes. It seems that in future updates, enhanced integration is something I would appreciate. Currently, there is integration with Docker, but when it comes to Kubernetes or other container solutions, it appears to be a challenge, especially with on-prem scanners."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable.io Container Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Container Security with 82 reviews while Tenable.io Container Security is ranked 21st in Container Security with 7 reviews. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4, while Tenable.io Container Security is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "The dashboard is very user-friendly and can be used to generate custom RQL based on user requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable.io Container Security writes "It helps you catch misconfigurations before they go into a production environment where they're harder to deal with". Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, AWS Security Hub and F5 Advanced WAF, whereas Tenable.io Container Security is most compared with Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Wiz, Trivy, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Sysdig Secure. See our Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Tenable.io Container Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
