• Home
  • ProsperOps vs. Spot Eco

ProsperOps vs Spot Eco comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
IBM Turbonomic
Read 204 IBM Turbonomic reviews
3,874 views|1,802 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
ProsperOps Logo
ProsperOps
143 views|123 comparisons
Spot by NetApp Logo
Spot Eco
336 views|280 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Cost Management
June 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ProsperOps and Spot Eco based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Cloud Cost Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Cost Management Report (Updated: June 2024).
Download the complete report
785,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Excels in providing stability, efficient resource optimization, and cost savings at the infrastructure layer, with...
It offers visibility and analytics for monitoring performance across our environment, starting from the application layer and extending down the... Read more →
Use ProsperOps?
Use Spot Eco?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We felt the pricing was very fair for the product. It is in no way prohibitive for larger deployments, unlike other similar product on the market."
  • "Contact the Turbonomic sales team, explain your needs and what you're looking to monitor. They will get a pre-sales SE on the phone and together work up a very accurate quote."
  • "What I can advise is to trial the product, taking advantage of the Turbonomic pre-sales implemention support and kickstart training."
  • "Licensing is per socket, so load up on the cores rather than a lot of lower core CPUs."
  • "You should understand the cost of your physical servers and how much time and money you are spending year over year on expanding your virtual farm."
  • "Price is a big one. VMTurbo was very competitively priced."
  • "If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does."
  • "It was an annual buy-in. You basically purchase it based on your host type stuff. The buy-in was about 20K, and the annual maintenance is about $3,000 a year."

    • More IBM Turbonomic Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    785,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?
    Top Answer:I have not seen Turbonomic's new pricing since IBM purchased it. When we were looking at it in my previous company… more »
    Read all 17 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Turbonomic?
    Top Answer:I would like Turbonomic to add more services, especially in the cloud area. I have already told them this. They can add… more »
    Read all 24 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?
    Top Answer:I mostly provide it to my clients. There are multiple reasons why they would use it depending on the client's needs and… more »
    Read all 26 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    ProsperOps
    Spot by NetApp
    Interactive Demo
    IBM
    Watch a demo
    ProsperOps
    Demo Not Available
    Spot by NetApp
    Demo Not Available
    Overview

    IBM Turbonomic is a performance and cost optimization platform for public, private, and hybrid clouds used by customers to assure application performance while eliminating inefficiencies by dynamically resourcing applications through automated actions. Common use cases include cloud cost optimization, cloud migration planning, data center modernization, FinOps acceleration, Kubernetes optimization, sustainable IT, and application resource management. Turbonomic customers report an average 33% reduction in cloud and infrastructure waste without impacting application performance, and return-on-investment of 471% over three years. Ready to take a closer look? Explore the interactive demo or start your free 30-day trial today!

    ProsperOps is highly valued for its autonomous AWS cost optimization, handling Reserved Instances and Savings Plans efficiently. It enhances financial governance with detailed insights and offers budget forecasting tools, improving operational efficiency and reducing manual financial management errors. Users appreciate its dynamic RI management and user-friendly dashboard for effective cost and savings oversight.

    Spot Eco automatically optimizes and manages your cloud commitment portfolio, providing immediate savings on cloud spend that increases over time. With Eco, you can confidently control your cloud spend with a fully managed solution that adapts to your usage and operational needs without the risk of financial lock-in or overspending. On average Eco customers save 50% on their cloud bill.

    Eco supports a widerange of commitment types, include Reserved Instances and Savings Plans on AWS and Azure. On AWS Eco supports many instance types including EC2, RDS, Redshift, ElastiCache, ECS, OpenSearch, and more.

    Click Here to Learn More About Spot Eco

    Sample Customers
    IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
    Information Not Available
    Lacework, Ticketmaster, Arcadia, Chegg, and TuneIn
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company36%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    University5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Cost Management
    June 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: June 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    785,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ProsperOps is ranked 20th in Cloud Cost Management while Spot Eco is ranked 15th in Cloud Cost Management. ProsperOps is rated 0.0, while Spot Eco is rated 0.0. On the other hand, ProsperOps is most compared with , whereas Spot Eco is most compared with Zesty, Cloudability, Spot Ocean and nOps.

    See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.