We performed a comparison between RSA enVision and Trellix ESM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of this solution is the reporting."
"The most valuable feature is the management features. It's capable of managing large enterprises."
"The configuration part is very easy...The technical support was sincere in their responses...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."
"The product’s most valuable feature is log monitoring."
"I like the ease of deployment."
"The most valuable feature for us is that it comes with many correlations, reports, and dashboards already available. It's also very easy to use."
"The most valuable features of McAfee ESM are intrusion detection, malware protection, and the device controller."
"The most valuable feature is that if the scanning does find something, it quarantines it. Then you can decide what you are going to do with it."
"It is user-friendly. The notification part of McAfee ESM is very easy."
"It has performed well and delivered the results that I have been looking for."
"I rate the tool's deployment an eight out of ten. The deployment is completed in two days."
"The integration could be easier, it should support more products."
"In general, the solution currently isn't user-friendly."
"RSA enVision log manager is out of date and is not in use anymore."
"The user interface could be more user-friendly."
"The disk space needed for events is not clear. In all clients, we had at least more than 100GB free that we could not use."
"We would welcome integrations with some of the new McAfee acquisitions, e.g., behavioural analytics."
"I would like to see improvements to the user interface."
"I have to purchase a new box now. Its existing box is not scalable and I can't use it anymore."
"There should be support for multitenancy in the product."
"McAfee ESM is not user-friendly and the log is not accurate. For instance, if I were assigned to generate a log for changes made today, I wouldn't be able to see all the modifications. While Palo Alto allows us to see all changes, McAfee ESM only captures one out of every ten changes. It's crucial to have visibility into all changes made."
"Update to user interface from version 9 is cosmetic in some aspects, and after a few clicks you are back on the old interface."
RSA enVision is ranked 35th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 5 reviews while Trellix ESM is ranked 18th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 34 reviews. RSA enVision is rated 6.8, while Trellix ESM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of RSA enVision writes "Though the solution offers good technical support, it needs to be made more user-friendly ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix ESM writes "Provides visibility of all the traffic within the company infrastructure". RSA enVision is most compared with NetWitness Platform, Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Sentinel, whereas Trellix ESM is most compared with ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM), IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, LogRhythm SIEM and Trellix Helix. See our RSA enVision vs. Trellix ESM report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.