We performed a comparison between SAP S4HANA on AWS and Virtustream xStream based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)."I appreciate the reliability and performance of SAP S/4HANA on AWS. It demonstrates high integration and stability, making it a widely used choice in various industries, including manufacturing, such as factories, carmakers, and battery production. It effectively covers a broad spectrum of business areas, which is beneficial."
"Technical support is very good from SAP and AWS...Scalability is always available in the solution...With a stable environment, it should be running very nicely."
"The product’s high availability is its best feature."
"The system has the capacity to manage all these departments in a single box and they're all integrated."
"SAP S4HANA on AWS has high performance. All the data is in one place and it's real-time. When you make an entry you don't have to wait a couple of minutes, hours, or overnight as something the batch process takes time. It is instantaneous and is available to everybody."
"It is indeed a stable solution, but it depends on how you architecture the component in AWS. If the component has the right architecture and is properly provisioned and placed, then it will be a stable platform."
"SAP S4HANA on AWS is an easy-to-use solution."
"SAP S4HANA's most valuable features include backup, security, storage, infrastructure, and enabling AI."
"The solution has encryption which we did not have before."
"The solution's overall enterprise support could be improved."
"There are a few complexities when it comes to licensing that could be simplified."
"S4HANA is expensive. It costs much more than SuccessFactors."
"The tool should undergo an overall improvement, including support. Data sharing should also be faster."
"The product could use more capabilities in the areas of robotics, machine learning and artificial intelligence, but these improvements are already on the way."
"This solution is very resource-intensive, including high memory and CPU utilization."
"If you go to AWS's site they offer training programs that are very good. SAP does not do the same, if SAP could provide some training that would be great."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy."
"Our account representative was inexperienced, they could improve on how they are managing accounts."
Earn 20 points
SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews while Virtustream xStream is ranked 20th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS). SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2, while Virtustream xStream is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Virtustream xStream writes "Improves efficiencies, has encryption, and great mission-critical customer support". SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Amazon AWS, whereas Virtustream xStream is most compared with Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
