We performed a comparison between SecurityScorecard and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, BitSight and others in IT Vendor Risk Management."I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"The tool gives us fewer false positives. Compared to its competitors, the solution’s reports are more accurate."
"Tenable is the leading product for vulnerability scanning."
"The tool provides us insight into the happens of the network and its hosts. It provides me with a list of hosts."
"Tenable SC is good for reporting and alerting. The filtering feature is also very valuable. Its integration with multiple vendors is quite good. It can be integrated with SIEM solutions and PAM solutions such as Thycotic, which is very helpful."
"Tenable SC's most valuable features are the low number of false positives and the strong capability of providing prioritization for the vulnerabilities detected."
"The predictive prioritization features are pretty good. They do a lot of research and we trust the research that they do internally. They have knowledge of what's going on with many companies, where we only get a view into what's going on here. So the ability to get best practices out of them as part of this solution, is valuable to us."
"I think that this is a good solution for evaluating vulnerability in the network."
"The Auto-Remediate feature is good."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"There is not much room for improvement. However, there should be a guide that describes the step-by-step procedures for doing tasks. Otherwise, training is required from a senior guy to a junior guy."
"The solution should provide better web application features and support."
"The integration is very good, although it still needs to improve."
"The solution should include compliance-based scanning."
"Its reporting can be improved. It is not easy to generate a scan report the way we want. The data is okay, but we can't easily change the template to make it look the way we want."
"I will say it's a lot slower compared to an MS scan. It takes so much longer, so the performance could definitely be worked on."
"Though the solution's technical support is responsive, they do take a lot of time, making it one of the solution's shortcomings that needs improvement."
"The product should provide risk-based vulnerability management."
SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Rapid7 InsightVM, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Horizon3.ai.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.