We performed a comparison between TestRail and Zephyr Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Management Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."
"The API to support integration of the homemade automated testing tool."
"This is a user friendly solution."
"I haven't faced any stability issues using the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."
"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."
"I was on the lookout for automation testing on the browser and I believe this tool is very interesting in that matter. The solution is useful for UI testing. You just need to add the URL that is to be checked."
"Integration with Confluence and JIRA."
"It has 90% of the basic features you need without having to pay a lot of extra money."
"The solution does its job well."
"It has many features, but the main things that we need are the test cycles and integration with automation because we have automation for the web and mobile applications. We use it for test case management to run the test cases and get the results. At this moment, it is fulfilling our requirements. We are able to get the test execution report and the test pass and fail report. This summary is delivered to our management."
"We use the solution for test case management."
"If anyone is looking for a good, lightweight, flexible and agile test management product, I think they would do very well with Zephyr Enterprise."
"Zephyr Enterprise is a stable solution."
"It has integration with test automation tools."
"I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application."
"It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language."
"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."
"Reporting could be more flexible regarding repeating reports."
"There are a number of improvements that have been requested. While I don't have a list of these requests available, many can be found on Gurock's forum."
"The reports should be more user-friendly."
"TestRail should improve its pricing."
"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools."
"The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."
"We faced some errors while uploading the test cases."
"We would like support for the agile and behavior-driven development (BDD) approaches."
"The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."
"Creating better default varieties of reporting would make the product much better and more popular."
"Security needs improvement to protect customer information better."
"We have a lot of automation for our products, and we require a utility for its integration with automation. Currently, we have to write this utility ourselves. It would be great if they can provide such a utility."
"Zephyr Enterprise needs to redesign the reporting."
TestRail is ranked 2nd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews while Zephyr Enterprise is ranked 4th in Test Management Tools with 8 reviews. TestRail is rated 8.0, while Zephyr Enterprise is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zephyr Enterprise writes "Highly stable solution and meets users' needs". TestRail is most compared with TFS, Tricentis qTest, Tricentis Tosca, Sealights and OpenText ALM / Quality Center, whereas Zephyr Enterprise is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center, Tricentis Tosca, Tricentis qTest, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and TFS. See our TestRail vs. Zephyr Enterprise report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.