We performed a comparison between Tricentis Tosca and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Very user-friendly and the low code automation is really helpful."
"The use of automation is most valuable."
"We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis."
"It's been very helpful to have connectivity with mobile. The tool also identifies some of the actual changes from the recordings on the actual testing suite. That is something that I really like."
"This solution is very easy to learn and any non-programmer or manual tester, with little experience in automation, can pick it up quite easily."
"The mainframe testing and UI automation are the most valuable aspects of the solution."
"One notable feature is its ability to handle negative XPath healing processes. If one XPath fails, Tosca can utilize backup XPaths to ensure test cases do not fail due to locator issues, thereby focusing on identifying application-side issues, which is the ultimate goal."
"The technical support is good, we were satisfied."
"The stability has always been very good."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a user-friendly solution."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability."
"User-friendly ID and direct integration with GitHub are the most valuable."
"Very difficult to get information about licensing costs."
"It requires some coding customization that requires expertise."
"You need to spend much more time learning the tool and how to use it, compared to others."
"With regard to areas of improvement, report customization should be easier. It would be good if Tosca could provide standard reports for at least 20 variants. At present, there are only three to four variants. The mobile engine needs to be faster and easier to use; it is a bit cumbersome. Also, the object identification in the mobile engine needs improvement. I would like to see easy-to-use customizations for reports in the next release."
"Primarily I'm dealing with customers looking for a cheap solution, and they are willing to try open-source automation solutions. So from this perspective, the price of Tosca is not as competitive."
"I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users. They are not obviously present."
"Parallel execution is not yet implemented for Tosca. This means you can't execute the same test case on multiple machines remotely."
"Tosca's reporting features could be better. Tricentis had a reporting tool called Analytics, but it didn't function properly after they reworked it. After that, they tried a new approach with key-tracing, and that didn't work."
"The vendor must release a lightweight version of the solution."
"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."
"Visual Studio Test Professional should include more automation."
"Over the years, I haven't identified any specific enhancements that I desire; Visual Studio has consistently met my requirements seamlessly and flawlessly."
"Its UI could be better."
"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."
"The interface should be made attractive."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 98 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and TestRail. See our Tricentis Tosca vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.