Over 278,683 professionals have used IT Central Station research.
Compare the best Service Virtualization vendors based on product reviews, ratings, and comparisons.
All reviews and ratings are from real users, validated by our triple authentication process.
The total ranking of a product, represented by the bar length, is based on a weighted aggregate score.
The score is calculated as follows: The product with the highest count in each area gets the highest available score.
(20 points for Reviews; 16 points for Views, Comparisons, and Followers.)
Every other product gets assigned points based on its total in proportion to the #1 product in
that area. For example, if a product has 80% of the number of reviews compared to the product
with the most reviews then the product's score for reviews would be 20% (weighting factor) *
80% = 16. For Average Rating, the maximum score is 32 points awarded linearly based on our
rating scale of 1-10. If a product has fewer than ten reviews, the point contribution
for Average Rating is reduced (one-third reduction in points for products with 5-9 reviews;
two-thirds reduction for products with fewer than five reviews). Reviews that are more than 24 months old,
as well as those written by resellers, are completely excluded from the ranking algorithm.
When evaluating Service Virtualization tools, IT Central Station users explain that it is important to understand your specific needs as well as the capabilities of the various tools. Users note that earlier defect identification as well as the ability to spin up virtual services without purchasing additional hardware are valuable features of these tools. Buyers should also take into consideration the types of licenses available, associated costs and integration with other products.
Service Virtualization Reviews
Read reviews of Service Virtualization that are trending in the IT Central Station community:
Your trust is our top concern, so companies can't alter or remove reviews.
For CA Service Virtualization, it’s the ability to quickly prototype something. My guys really like the ability where they can do the recording session. It's a way for them to initialize for existing services where they need to get it up and... more»
When I originally bought Service Virtualization there were several things that we leveraged it for. One of them was that we had a merger acquisition, and we needed to interface the two systems together. So we needed to be able to share all... more»
There were things early where we couldn’t do a few things in Service Virtualization that have since been updated. The concern I have right now with Release Automation is the concept of what we call immutable objects, so I build it once in... more»
The most valuable feature is that it reduces the dependency so that the down time of the environment is not a major cost. That cost can be used for something else like the cloud. The important is thing is that Service Virtualization allows... more»
I can use functional performer automation everywhere. However, the questions still remain of when and how I need to use it. If I run a load test and I need a Service Virtualization, I can use the same asset. But when I'm using the same asset... more»
The awareness of Service Virtualization needs to be improved. People still have doubts about having a virtual asset over a physical environment. They want to know if they are going to behave differently, or in a similar way. They want to know... more»
It is introducing a lot more flexibility for us. It reduces time scales, getting time to market. It also helps us cross-skill some of the people, and start to really bring that DevOps mentality into the bank. I suppose in our payments estate... more»
It's time to market of course, and also the total cost of ownership. We don't have to build big end-to-end environments anymore. Previously, any major project would come along and say, "I need to build more kit," and you just keep filling... more»
I think the ones we've wanted have come through, actually. Because ours was such an old version, and we said at the time, "We'd like to see x, y, and zed". They're already in 9, and what I've seen of version 10, it's even more closely bundled... more»
Service Virtualization allows you to function in an isolated manner. It allows you to not be so dependent on systems that, in traditional testing, causes you delays, causes impacts to your overall time testing schedule, and just creates an... more»
The biggest thing, the huge time to market gain. The other thing is just financial efficiency. We're seeing huge financial gains in terms of using the tools. One of the biggest things that I like about the CA products is they do what they say... more»
I think some of the monitoring capabilities could be enhanced. Those aren't necessarily major gaps for us, but I think that would be good. Just some of the real time monitoring and reporting capabilities. Some of the solutions that we've had... more»
The whole service virtualization concept works on integration patterns, so the service virtualization should be supporting the regular RESTful services. However, it should also support services that listen and reply to MQs, generic JMS, SAP... more»
It has improve our organization a lot. For example, one of our very recent client's implementations that our Patson USA team did, we saved more than $15 million. This is in confirmed savings. In the past three and a half years of our... more»
With service virtualization, I'd love to see support for the Internet of things. I would love to see a web portal that the developers can use without consuming the virtual service designer license. This portal would be a lightweight utility... more»
A while ago, we were looking for a tool to do testing across the web services. During that time, we were doing some PoCs on SoapUI. We did a PoC with Lisa. The company name was ITKO. After going through several PoC sessions, we figured out... more»
At the point of next release, we would really like to see the issues being resolved which we are facing right now with dynamic applications. Now, most of the applications in the market, in the industry, and most of the companies are rolling... more»
The concept's almost identical on that topic with respect to the old methodologies or legacy practices. You go in and actually install bare metal machines, put a virtualization engine on top of it, and try to do a P2V move. Where today with... more»
Pricing is always a concern for our clients, so my guess is if anything can be beat it's price. It's knocking the price down to compete with the white-box vendors out there. If we were able to compete in any other area it would to compete in... more»
Using the agile method, each iteration is scheduled to last 1-2 weeks and development would take up most of that. The testers didn't have enough time to properly test the application. With Service Virtualization, we virtualized the services... more»
We not only use Service Virtualization for web services, we also use it to virtualize services that we used to pay for. It can be used in the enterprise bus to integrate external applications. In the QA domain, you need to pay a lot to use... more»
We still have mainframe systems and while CA provides instructions on how to integrate Linux-based applications, they don’t provide integration steps for mainframe. We would like to see improvements in mobile integration. Integration is... more»
I think it definitely helps us reduce time to market, and in terms of dollar savings it helps us quite a bit. There are many testing applications that reach out to third-party vendors where every transaction costs, and we are able to... more»
One major feature I would like to see is on the user administration part. Right now, anybody can access any of the folders and any of the projects. If they could bring in someone amount of user administration, that would help us a lot.
IBM RTVS has many useful features, but support for IBM MQ over this tool is unbeatable. It has very easy and good validation techniques used for SWIFT, XSD, and WSDL validations. Another feature is where we can specify optional nodes/tags of... more»
It helped us to build IBM MQ based stubs and automated test cases swiftly. Organization for which I use this in exploring the latest technologies and IBM MQ is wide spread among all. IBM RTVS helped to play with MQ where RFH, RFH2 headers... more»
One of the biggest disappointments for me and my team was dependency on various patches, or so call clients for every single technology. You have to download and install clients for HTTP/ MQ/ JMS or any other type of protocol. Ideally, the... more»
It is easy to use, has a faster time to market, and provides flexibility. On our customer side, we have actually done a lot with this particular tool. It has helped a lot of teams to accelerate their testing and development, and saved a lot... more»
* The enterprise catalog. Usually what happens is once you have a set of virtual services, then you go to an enterprise. So, people would like to see what is already virtualized and how can they take advantage of it. Right now, it is actually... more»
A couple of the most valuable features, to me, are the fact that you can have a lot of different people with different technologies use the tool, without any programming experience at all, all the way up to people who can program. And then,... more»
It allows you to have a bunch of manual testers who can easily use the tool set, as well as hardcore devs or SDETs who know how to code. They can also use the tool set. And, on the virtualization side, it really kind of helps you save money,... more»
I really want to see more of the "express" kind of model, where you get a little bit for free. I'd love to be able to see you be able to edit and author tests without having to be connected to a licensed server. And then, if you want to go... more»
It is very beneficial in reducing the redundancies during development, which can easily provide a better platform for continuous integration (CI) by cutting down the dependencies on the rest of the API team. Various recordings can be done so... more»
Since its the initial stage for us in which we have started using ServiceV Pro, there are not many areas of improvement that I think of, but the effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where... more»
It helps us with work/life balance. If we didn't have that CA Service Virtualization, we would have to run our performance tests during the night, because that's when the mainframe is least used. For our team members it helps them to maintain... more»
Regarding additional features for future releases, that is something we'll come to know when we start using it at full scale. But so far, we're pretty content with what has been offered. In terms of improvements, I think a little bit more of... more»
For service virtualization, we had a lot of subsystems in our application; and we had lot of dependencies on the downstream applications. We extensively used service virtualization to reduce these dependencies, which could be due to... more»
To the best of my knowledge (and memory), listed below are the few challenges we were facing at that time. It could be possible that CA would have already addressed a few of these limitations and short falls. * Simultaneous execution of... more»
CA Service Virtualization has helped us advance the development cycle when third-party interfaces are not available to us. We're able to simulate that activity. Working with the developers, we're able to get our testing site done in advance,... more»
We are able to get further testing on a couple of interfaces. We do a lot of third-party request out for a loan; fraud verification; credit bureau. A lot of times, those data setup and data needs take a longer period of time than what maybe... more»
I'd like to see more of the newer technologies included in there, looking mainly from a mobile perspective, possibly, so you can virtualize some of the aspects that we're going to be doing for mobile testing.
For service virtualization, you can have continuous testing and development without interruption to your test cycle. For dev test, I been able to customize to being able to test, automate batch testing, and integrate that with my API testing... more»
It's giving us a base start to add some customer framework so that we all behave in the same manner. For example, we've integrated it with Jenkins. We started to use the invoke XML results to integrate with other services to show us results.... more»
The virtualization options in the product: We can now virtualize entire backend systems or chains. That makes test and acceptance environments much more readily available, which offers more testing possibilities that results in better quality.
I would like to see better GUI testing possibilities. It only supports web testing by working with Selenium: DevTest is positioned as a test automation tool. People want to use it as that, but then they find out it needs Selenium with all the... more»
The tool is helping us to build various virtual services for various middle layer components: MQ, REST, and SOAP services. Using service virtualization, we are able to accelerate the testing and development activity. Without SV, integration... more»
As per my working experience over the last three and half years with RIT/RTVS, I would consider the two following areas of improvement: * Reporting: In the recent release of RCPT, the "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs... more»
The most valuable feature of CA Service Virtualization is that overall, it is a system-based product for virtualizing the services. There are many tools that offer RESTful calls. However, with this product, we have many other options such as... more»
There are a lot of benefits of this solution but I will give you the top benefit from my experience. Since I am from the testing team, I have to test a particular service and the service needs to be developed either by a third party or I am... more»
This is what I have spoken to the CA people as well, I would like them to include mainframe testing within this tool. Right now, we can do service virtualization but there is no mainframe testing feature in this tool such as batch processing,... more»
Joost's main speciality is Service Virtualization. He consults and develops solutions for and with customers to their exact needs. Besides Service Virtualization Joost is also an specialist in other domains of the testtooling, for instance Test Automation, Performance testing and Test Data... more>>
- Middleware tester and implementor of virtual web services to different backends using ITKO CA LISA product.
- QA Analyst performing the role of testing through most of the phases of Software development life cycle.
- Developed and implemented an accounting application using Java and MS access... more>>
Service Virtualization Solution Consultant
-Design, develop and scaling of virtual services (Service Oriented Virtualization) for heterogeneous component-based applications
-Experienced working on Oracle WebLogic, TIBCO BW, IBM MQ, JMS
-Developed and Implemented integrated SOA Test... more>>
Having around 6 years of overall IT experience in Software Testing.
• Expertise in test automation for SOA testing using CA-LISA / DevTest Tool, HP UFT and SoapUI Tool.
• Comprehensive knowledge on CA LISA Service Virtualization Tool and IBM RIT.
• Automated Data driven end to end... more>>
Senior Associate - SOA Test Automation and Service Virtualization Technical Manager
A dynamic Professional with an intent to learn new technologies and tools having 6.7 years of industry experience as a QA Engineer/QA Management Consultant [Manual & Automation] .
I aim to serve this Industry with my intellegence and come up with innovative and smart solutions.
I am a... more>>
I help organizations improve their testing efforts through smart application of test tools.
I have around 10 years of experience in the test automation field and have designed and implemented test automation solutions in Java and C# for a wide range of clients. I make sure that automated tests... more>>
I help to organizations to improve their Software Development Life Cycle. My main speciality is software change and configuration management, but I've worked in each step in the SDLC. I also have expertise in service virtualization solutions. I have designed and implemented SDLC solutions.... more>>
Test Automation - Framework design & development
Test Automation (GUI, Web Services) using commercial and free tools (HP QTP/UFT, Selenium, Coded UI, CA LISA/DevTest, SoapUI, SilkTest)
Application Lifecycle Management tools (HP Quality Center, Team Foundation Server)
Continuous Integration... more>>
A lot of experience on a lot of different environments, languages and techniques.
Key skills & knowledge:
-PC (Windows, DOS, Linux)
-Servers (zLinux (virtual servers on zVM)
Not sure which Service Virtualization solution is right for you?Download our free Service Virtualization Report and find out what your peers are saying about CA Technologies, Micro Focus, Parasoft, and more!