User Reviews of Arbor DDoS & Imperva DDoS

Updated March 2024

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing Arbor DDoS and Imperva DDoS based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






Arbor DDoS review

Robert Plese
Robert Plese
Network Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Good reporting and works well as an out-of-path DDoS protector
There should be an automatic way to configure it to monitor traffic and decide which is an attack and which is not. In Arbor, you need to tweak and set all parameters manually, whereas in Check Point DDoS Protector, you can select the lowest parameters, and over the weeks, Check Point DDoS Protector will learn the traffic and you can then...
Imperva DDoS review

Syed Ubaid Ali Jafri
Syed Ubaid Ali Jafri
Head of Cyber Defense & Offensive Security at Habib Bank Limited
I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions.
They could improve by minimizing false positive results. Although this occurs less with Imperva, we would like to see some further improvements. We have been using this product for last 1 years, it's result is very impressive. But due to the excessive load on the Web site where thousands of requests‎ are generated from legitimate users,...

Since 2012, we've had 768,246 professionals use our research.

As seen in