user reviews of
IBM Engineering Workflow Management & Jira

Updated JULY 2019

Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you. Would you like to learn about products from people using them now?

Download our FREE report comparing IBM Engineering Workflow Management and Jira based on reviews, features, and more!

...and 15 more!

Where should we email your report?






IBM Engineering Workflow Management review

reviewer1513104
Manager, Digital Engineering at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Great inbuilt traceability reporting; unfortunately, the solution is heavily...
Unfortunately, the solution is very heavily vendor dependent. It requires a strong partnership with IBM, and you rely on them for fixes or access to certain things. There are new fixes all the time and each new fix can bring in a new functionality. The development aspect is not well aligned. There's a requirement tool, a testing tool, a...
Jira review

RobertCampbell
RobertCampbell
Product Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Great for collaboration, very stable, and extracting data is straightforward
The way that Azure DevOps rolled out their boards and made them flexible is something that Jira lacks. You want a workflow and you're configuring your columns and you're mapping status to columns, however, in Jira, you can't have more columns than you do status. Whereas in Azure DevOps from a Jira admin perspective, it's amazing as it...

Since 2012, we've had 554,382 professionals use our research.

As seen in