User Reviews of Pure Storage FlashBlade & Red Hat Ceph Storage

Updated March 2024

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing Pure Storage FlashBlade and Red Hat Ceph Storage based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






Pure Storage FlashBlade review

reviewer1430535
Architecte technique at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Stable with good technical support and easy to manage
Compared to, for example, Hitachi NAS, the solution is not mature at all. It's just in its infancy as far as technology goes. That means there are some features that just arent yet available on the product. When we ask for customization or certain features, we'll get a response saying "it's not available yet" or "that's in the pipeline". We...
Red Hat Ceph Storage review

reviewer234109
reviewer234109
Sr. Systems Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Provides block storage and object storage from the same storage cluster.
The ability to provide block storage and object storage from the same storage cluster is very valuable for us. We are using Ceph as back-end storage for our OpenStack cloud. Ceph provides: * Block storage for storing the OpenStack images or VM templates * Block storage for OpenStack Cinder volume service * Block storage for OpenStack Nova...

Since 2012, we've had 765,386 professionals use our research.

As seen in