User Reviews of OpenText UFT Developer & Selenium HQ
Updated March 2024
Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.
Download our FREE report comparing OpenText UFT Developer and Selenium HQ based on reviews, features, and more!
Where should we email your report?
OpenText UFT Developer review
Systems Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
Great features with good stability and an easy initial setup
The pricing could be improved. It's a bit high right now. They could make it more reasonable. Currently, the functionalities do not exist on Ranorex or UFT, however, as the industry continues to evolve and put more applications into a mobile device, the implementation of testing in a mobile device, using either Ranorex or UFT or XYZ, et...
Selenium HQ review
Naveen Alok
Senior Software Developer at Novo Nordisk
Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions
There are a few things we have to actually design and plan when we are building the automation. There are new tools which handle it by themselves, but that is a give and take when you actually use or choose a tool. Shadow DOM could be improved and the handling of single page applications. Right now, it's a bit complicated and there are a...
Since 2012, we've had 767,847 professionals use our research.
As seen in